Laserfiche WebLink
? <br />suggesting that ttie 25 foot poles be lowered to 18 or 20 foot high, he also <br />suggested that the fence be raised so that it shields the neighbors. He asked <br />if any service work was going to be done there. Building Commissioner Conway <br />advised that only a car wash has been added within the building, no lift <br />stations, or mechanical area is to be installed in the building. It was clarified <br />that the warranty work would be done across.the street. Mr. Giesser stated that <br />these shovel lights addressed the problem of the glare from the lights. Mrs. <br />Schmitz stated that.the Nissan Dealership has this same fixture and the residents <br />are very upset about the light that they get. Mrs. Botson stated that after her <br />daughter was raped, she asked Mr. Halleeri to move the trucks which created <br />shadows and change the lighting on the side, but he did not return her call. She <br />maintained that she has tried to.contact him at least a dozen time, and he has <br />never responded. Mr. Gorris questioned if there would be enough room to put in a <br />mound on the side or rear, and Mr. Conway responded that there was only about 5 <br />feet of grass there. Mr. 'ioma.s preferred a 10 foot fence like the one Nightfall <br />has. Mr. Orlowski suggested split block. Mr. Tallon believed that there was about <br />a 10 to 12 foot drop from the front to the back, and believed that the mound on <br />the Kenny King had to be 9 feet high. He explained that the building was elevated <br />to the height of Lorain Road. Mr. Tallon did not believe that three poles with <br />1,000 watt lights are necessary in a storage area and suggested that 500 watts of <br />light with poles no higher than 15 feet maXimurn, since all that is needed is <br />security lighting. These lights are directed down which should eliminate some of <br />the glare, but 1,000 watts on 25 foot poles would light the area like a Christmas <br />tree. Mr. Tallon aSlCj Mr. Gorris R9'Y'P_P(i that rh; G W(llll[l maka t}ia r-nnrli ti nn wnrao <br />for the neighbors and questioned the need for <br />present light was acceptable for the truck dealerst <br />they were adding to the paging system. This would <br />The members discussed the plans among themselves. T <br />lighting was needed in the rear. Mr. Skoulis and N`? <br />should be lower so that the residents would not seE <br />would 5ti11 be a glow. Mr. Gorris stated that th <br />apparently has caused some problems to the nei <br />remedies should be auggestec(. R. Tallon moved to <br />Olmsted proposal to' renovate exterior of building <br />the Architectural Review Board for their input, t <br />be submitted, and with the request that the A.R.B. <br />landscaping on the east side which should buffer <br />landscaping in the front .from an aesthetic stE <br />lighting be eliminated, the height of the poles be <br />poles could remain at 1000 watt, the side poles hE <br />plans with elevations, cuts, etc. must be subm <br />around.the building should be eliminated; and a; <br />review the lighting including the ntunber of pole., <br />consider a 12 foot fence on the side and rear. It <br />Safety Department and Building Departments submit <br />received about this property, Seconded by J. Thon <br />N`ir. Gorris clarified that it was to be made clea: <br />concerned about the negative impact that this devel <br />residential district from the start, and hopefully <br />done. At least, everything could be.put in writir. <br />have to go to court. T1r. Thomas asked that the . <br />recommendationso <br />additional lighting when the <br />ip. Mrs. Schmitz questioned if <br />not be indicated on the plans. <br />ro Gorris did not believe more <br />. Tallon agreed that the poles <br />a harsh glare, however there <br />is is a developed site, which <br />ghbors in the past and some <br />refer the Oldsmobile of North <br />and add exterior lighting to <br />iat a colored rendering should <br />nake suggestions regarding the <br />the residential area and the <br />ndpoint; also that the rear <br />reduced to 20 foot, the front <br />ve to be reduced to 500 watts; <br />tted; the band of neon going <br />?k the Architectural Board to <br />. We request that the A.R.B. <br />is further requested"that the <br />a11 complaints that have been <br />3s, and unanimously approved. <br />• that the Commission was very <br />opment has had on the adjacent <br />at this time something can be <br />; in the event this would ever <br />LR.B. nnt hnlcl hark rm tha;r <br />4) Thomasville Home Furnishings by Baker, 24869 Lorain Road. <br />Proposal to renovate existing canopy and brick in two existing doors. <br />- ?-, <br />4