Laserfiche WebLink
.....:...._.....____--...,__.._..._..._,?____.....,.:._?.._._ ....:........---_......_ -- - <br />f <br />-?....,-d <br />the dirt road connecting Silverdale and Selhurst and also included installing <br />storm sewers. Now the city is asking for approval of the new plat in order to <br />complete the road, and will now include installing a connecting water main <br />between Silverdale and Selhurst which the Water Department requested after they <br />had'_approved the plans. In return for dedicating the right of way and at the <br />request of the owner, Mr. Limpert, the eity will be extending the water line and <br />pavement somewhat further east. Mr. Limpert explained the history of the property <br />and advised that he had no problem with dedicating the property, but he does want <br />a document stating that his property is free and clear of any assessments along <br />with the extension of the roadway and water main. Mr. Dubelko could see no <br />problem with that request. K. 0'Rourke moved to accept the proposal by the city <br />for the Duane Road Right Of Way Dedication, a twenty (20) foot wide strip <br />adjacent to the existing north line of Duane Road which is needed for roadway <br />improvements and that a letter from the city will show that there are no <br />enctunbrances on the property, that a water ma.in will be put in as stated and that <br />paving will run the distance of the property as indicated on the drawing, <br />seconded by A. Skoulis, and unanimously approved. . <br />V. COMM[JrTICATIONS : <br />A notice of a forum on signage on April 23rd if any member wants to attend. <br />VI. COMNIITTEE REPORTS: <br />-Mr. Skoulis, advised that Mr. Tallon, Mr. Orlowski and he visited the Wittlatch <br />Company Cluster Home Development in Strongsville to determine if their smaller <br />square foot imits would be acceptable in North Olmsted. They came to no positive <br />conclusion, but the squa.re footage seemed to be adequate. However, they had other <br />concerns: the rnmiber of imits in the development; the narrow streets; the crowded <br />appearance of the development and the drainage. Since North Olmsted codes are <br />similar to Strongsville's they were concerned that this type of development could <br />be built here. He believed that the way the code is written allows for this high <br />density since 6 units an acre can be figured on the totaT area, including <br />.recreational areas, etc., but the units can be crowded into a smaller area. This <br />development had row after row of buildings along narrow streets (he estimated <br />street to be about 18 feet wide) whieh did not seem to have sidewalks and there <br />was only room for one car in the drive.between the street and the garage. Mr. <br />Orlowski noted that this development contained 265 units but a smaller one might <br />not look as compact as this one does. At this point; the committee is considering <br />allowing the smaller square footage requiremerit for units in smaller projects, <br />for instance, a 3 to 5 acre parcel with a proper configuration might be <br />acceptable. Mr.. Skoulis believed that the Commission should review the Single <br />Family Cluster code again. Ghairman Gorris suggested that the committee do this <br />and make recomendations to the Commission. Building Comnissioner Conway has <br />requested a site plan of this development from Strongsville. Mr. Basala, <br />Wittlatch and Company, was present and advised that the only way a development <br />can be built with 6 imits per acres is to include a large number of 4 and 5 imit <br />builclings in a development, and the North 0]msted code limits buildings to 3 <br />units which would automatically limits the density. He stated that the larger the <br />footprint of the buildings, the more crowded a development would look, so a <br />larger square footage requirement would give a more crowded appearance. He stated <br />that in the Strongsville development the streets are dedicated and are 25 feet <br />wide with sidewalks, and there will be a total of 164 units, not 265. He <br />estimated that, if they subtracted the drainage ditch, comrmunity center, puttin <br />green which might possibly take up an acre, there would probably be about 7 or? <br />units per acre on the actual development area. They built up to what the code