My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/28/1994 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1994
>
1994 Board of Building Code Appeals
>
04/28/1994 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:32:46 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 8:12:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1994
Board Name
Board of Building Code Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
4/28/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
present evidence as to what he has found. After that Mr. Duffy should be given the opportunity to <br />cross examine him, and then the board members can ask questions, then briefly it should be <br />indicated why he is bringing it to this board. In response to Mr. Gareau's questions, Mr. Kettle <br />advised that he has been a building inspector for the city of North Olmsted for the past 6 years <br />aud had been a carpenter and general contractor for the last 41 years. His duties as an inspector of <br />the city of North Olmsted includes making structural, heating, and electrical inspections. During <br />1992 and 93 Mr. Kettle, as an inspector for the city of North Olmsted, did have occasion to <br />inspect the home at 5321 Whitehaven Avenue. Both before and after occupancy, he did note <br />certain violations after these inspections and reported them to the Building Commissioner: The B <br />vent was touching the roof sheathing, this vent is the one which exhausts the gases from the <br />furnace, and the manufacturers specifications and the code xequire it to be 1 inch away from the <br />pipe. The city of North Olmsted operates under the Cou.ncil of American Building Officials Code <br />(C.A.B.O.) and this situation was not in conformity with that code. Mr. Kettle notified Mr. <br />Simmons of these violations by letter. Other violations included the attic access which was 21 by <br />20 instead of 22 by 30 which is required by code; the anchor bolts which should be 6 foot ou <br />center in the foundation were not installed. When the house was inspected originally it was <br />pointed out to the contractor that some of the anchor bolts had been installed, but some were <br />missing, The contractor advised that they had run out of them; but they were getting some more <br />and they would be installed. Mr. Kettle stated' that he never went back to see if they had been <br />iustalled. The way the house is constructed'there is a possibility that these could be installed now. <br />This requirement is also a C.A.B.O. code. Further, the clearance on the stairs should be 6 foot, 8 <br />inches of head height walking down the stairs, on the lower part of the stair going from the first <br />to the second floor the angle of the step and the nearest obstruction is 6 foot, 4-1/2 inches. He <br />clarified that tlus is at the bottom of the step on the first floor going to the second. Also the <br />stairway to the basement had less than a 6 foot, 8 inch headroom, and was approximately 6 foot <br />at the bottom of the steps. The contractor was advised of this. He stated that when the house was <br />first built, they had found that there was not enough attic ventilation, aud more was added, but <br />apparently not enough was added. The code requires 1/150th of the attic area must have that <br />amount of ventilation, both in the eaves and the upper part of the" roof. The upper part seemed to <br />be sufficient, but there was not enough in the overhangs. The result of this could be condensation <br />in the attic area. He did find condensation in the area of where the exhaust fans blew out, and <br />there was mildew on the sheathing. But this was corrected and vents were added. He had also <br />noted that there was not enough clearance between the vents going through the roof. He just <br />found out about the insufficient ventilation recently, but except for that, the rest were brought to <br />the attention of the contractor in a memo to the Building Commissioner which was forwarded to <br />Mr. Simmons. Mr. Kettle has re-inspected this property, the most recent time being the day before <br />the meeting and stated that to his knowledge, nothing has been corrected. He also advised the <br />Building Commissioner verbally that that nothing had been done since the previous inspection. He <br />has not cliscussed these issues with Mr. Simmons since he made his last report. Mr. Duffy, <br />attorney for Mr. Simmons, then questioned Mr. Kettle. Mr. Kettle advised that the house was <br />occupied at present, that an occupancy permit had been issued, and that he and a retired <br />inspector, Mr. Sanker, had done part of that final inspection; but he was not a.n electrical inspector <br />at that time, and he did not know who did the electrical inspections. The occupancy permit was <br />issued in March of 1993, but the owners were given permission to move in because some items <br />could not be completed at that time of the year. He believed that the Foxes took occupancy in late <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.