12/14/1994 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r 3. Michael Donohue, 4625 Porter Rd Request for variance (1123.12). Request 550 square foot variance for garage area to construct new garage (existing garage will be demolished). Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(c)(1). Cha;rma„ Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Donohue. Mr. Gomersall advised that there was a note from one neighbor that they had no objection. Mr. Donohue explained the plans, and it was noted that the old garage would be removed and that the lot was quite deep. Several neighbors came forward at this time and the oath was administered to Ms. Ragle, Mr. Urvan, Mr. and Mrs. Dreher and Ms. Morozko. Neighbors had several objections since the garage would be as large as a barn and visible from across the street. Mr. Dreher stated that tlie garage was bigger than the house. Mr. Donohue responded that he intended to add on to the house. Mr. Dreher believed that this was out of proportion to the house and he should wait until he has enlarged the house to build this size garage. Mr. Donohue explaiued that he wanted to store his cars and have a workshop and when he built the addition to the house he would need to store bu.ilding materials in the garage. It was noted that the neighbor next door would have a 50 foot wall, seven feet from her lot. Ms. Morozko, the next door neighbor, noted that this would take up half of lus back yard.. After some discussion and compromise, N1r. Donohue agreed to reduce the garage 26 by 35 feet which would require a 160 square foot variance and is much closer to the normal size of a garage. Duiing the framing of the motion, it was clarified that he would remove the existing garage about 30 days after the new garage was completed. R. Gomersall moved to grant the request of Michael Donohue, 4625 Porter Road, for a 160 square foot variance for garage area to construct a new garage with the proviso that the existing garage will be demolished within 30 days. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(c)1. The motion was seconded by W. Purper, and unavi.mously approved. Variance granted. . 4. D. Rybarczvk, 6697 Nancy Drive Request for variance (1123.12). Request 5 foot side yard variance to install shed. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(d)(1). Chau7nau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. and Mrs. Rybarczyk and their neighbor, Mrs. Scahel, who owned the properry next to the shed. The garage would be right on the side property line. The members were concerned about their being able to maintain the shed with no room on their side. Mrs. Rybarczyk stated that the area was open and there was no fence on that side. Mrs. Scahel had no problem with the shed being on the line. The members were concemed that a new owner might want to put up a fence, and the shed might interfere with drainage. Mrs. Rybarczyk stated that they should deal with the conditions as they exist now, not with what might happen later on. Mr. Rybarczyk was concerned that if he moved the shed over, he would see it from his diniug room window and maintained that the drawing presented was not what he submitted. After some discussion, Mr. and Mrs. Rybarczyk maintained that the shed should be shown 2 foot from the line which would be a 3 foot variance and would allow room for maintenance. T. Kobema moved to grant the request of D. Rybarczyk, 6697 Nancy Drive for a 5 foot side yard variance to install a shed. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(d)1. The motion was seconded by R. Gomersall, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 5. Hennie Homes, Inc. Barton Road Parcel #3 Block "A.". West side of Barton Road last lot before Olmsted T Permanent Parcel number : 234-13-27 2