Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., <br />T located on_Brookpark Road, east of the <br />west of Colebrook and <br />at this point). <br />Request for vaxiance (1123.12). Request 670. square foot variance for total sign <br />area allowed for a business use. Request 746. square foot variance for total <br />signage allowed on a business building. Request variance to have 11 addition <br />building signs (one allowed per :code). Request variance for 6 building signs <br />which exceed the maximum 75 square feet allowed. Request variance for 4 building <br />signs that exceed the .maximtnn height allowed of 4 feet. Request variance for 2 <br />free standing ground signs (one allowed). request variance for 1 foot height <br />variance for ground sign located at Great Northern Blvd. entrance. Request <br />variance for 2 grounds signs (on Country Club Blvd. and on Great Northern Blvd.) <br />which are located in the 35 foot prohibited triangular area. Request variance for <br />certain signs which exceed definition of identification signs.(Note: approval of <br />property owner required for sign on Great Northern Blvd. Violations of Ord. <br />90-125, Sections 1163.11(a); 1163.11(b);1163.12(a); 1163.12(b); 1163.22(c); & <br />1163.03(a)(1)(e). <br />The representative was now present. Chairman Gomersall advised the audience that <br />this discussion would be limited to signs, nothing more. He asked anyone who <br />intended to speak should be sworn in at this time. Mr: Gomersall administered the <br />oath to Roger Newberry, engineer for Wal-Mart; Councilman McKay; L. Orlowski, <br />Vice-Chairman of Planning Commission; and residents, Ms. L. Musser, Ms. C. <br />Cleveland, Mrs. E. Schuler, Ms. J. Montillas, and A. Skoulis. Mr. Gomersall <br />reviewed the requests for variance as they appeared on the agenda and advised <br />that there were 9 requests. Mr. Newberry explai.ned that this is the standard sign <br />package for this prototype store and consists of several signs, most of which <br />exceed the maximums allowed by the city. The main "Wal-N`,art" sign, over the <br />entrance, is 7 by 56 feet and is back lit. Ztao other signs on the main facade of <br />the building are non illuminated and read "We Sell For Less" and "Satisfaction <br />Guaranteed" and are 2.5 feet high and about 75 to 76 feet long in total. A third <br />sign on the right side of the building identifies the "Tire and Lube Express" in <br />two rows, each row being 3 feet high and the aggregate length is 44 feet. In the <br />area of the colored band running across the middle of the structure there are 3 <br />signs, 1.5 feet high by varying lengths denoting "One Hour Photo Lab"; "Eye Care <br />Center"; and "Pharmacy". There are signs on both sides of the Tire, Battery, and <br />Oil (T.B.O.) (on the east and west elevations) with the name Wa1-Mart on one side <br />or the other of tha.t elevation. The sma.ll signs over the overhead doors have been <br />changed from what was presented, and two will now read "Lube Express" and a third <br />"Tire r7ounting". Mr. Gomersall asked for the audience's comments. Councilman <br />McKay stated that North Olmsted's sign ordinances was passed to get some kind of <br />conformity for signs and every time a variance is granted it goes against the <br />established criteria. He believed that 9 variances were not only excessive but <br />outrageous, and questioned how the boaxd could grant these variances when they <br />ha.ve denied others with fewer signs. -He urged the board to make the developers <br />stay within the ordinance. He noted tha.t the building was oversized to begin with <br />and needed two variances. Ms. Cleveland, who lives on Columbia Road, noted that a <br />Radisson Irm sign on I-480 -shined in her windows and is concerned that they, too, <br />r,ught request signs on I-480: Ms. Montillas believed that the "T.B.O." signs on <br />the rear of the building were excessive since customers would lmow where they <br />were, the signs over the doors might direct people. She further believed that all <br />the signs in front were excessive. If they do sell for less and if satisfaction <br />is guaranteed, it should be evident, it did not have to be proclaimed. ris. <br />Musser, a resident of the Westbury, advised that the residents of the Westbury <br />did not lmow that ldal-N1art was going in, only the building was notified which <br />upset the residents. She now can see Chester's, the hotel and the Corporate <br />Center from her windows and now she will ha.ve to look at Wal-Mart. She questioned <br />6