Laserfiche WebLink
'? - <br />? ?. <br />if the ground signs will be lighted and if they, too,. would shine into her <br />windows. She believed that the whole proposal is a mistake. Mr. L. Orlowski, Vice <br />Chairman of Planning Commission, advised that he had stated his opinion of these <br />signs in the Planning Commission minutes. Mr. Gomersall responded that the <br />members had all read the minutes. Mr. Orlowski believed that the signage on the <br />rear (facing Clareshire) was basically included in order to have a bargaining <br />point, something they could give up in lieu of keeping otlier signs. He sees no <br />point in having signs over the doors directing customers to where they can get <br />certain services. He noted that the overhead doors were on both the east and west <br />side of the T.B.O. He believed that the signs "Wa1-Mart" and "Tire and Lube <br />E?cpress" should be the only identification on the building, and specifically <br />thought that the signage over the doors should be eliminated. NIr. Skoulis, <br />representing the Park West Home Owners Association, verified that the letters on <br />the "Wal-Mart` sign were going to be 7 feet high. Mr. Gomersall responded that <br />that was w??at they were requesting, not necessarily what they are going to be. <br />Nir. Skoulis asked if the letters were the same size as the sign on the Medina <br />store. He doubted that those letters were 7 feet high ancl the building svas set <br />back approximately 400 to 500 feet from Pearl Road, and noted that this building <br />will anly be 33 feet from the road. He believed that this sign was overkill and <br />would shine into the windows of the Westbury. It was clarified that the sign <br />would be on the wall facing the Westbury. Mrs. Schuler, representing the three <br />Condominitun Owners' Associations, also believed that the signs were excessive and <br />that a 7 foot high sign could be seen from Lorain Roade The residents believed <br />that their neighborhood has been abused as is and asked that it not be further <br />abused. Mr. Newberry stated that there would be no signage facing Brookpark Road <br />on the north elevation of the building, and the only sign on Brookpark will a <br />mornunent sign. The neighbors, the developers, Mr. Conway and the members <br />discussed the signs privately. Mr. Newberry explained that there would be four <br />ground mounted signs, one at the main entrance on Brookpark, one near the <br />Chester's drive (Great Northern Boulevard), one at the Country Club entrance, and <br />an internal sign directing customers to the T.B.O. Each monument sign is built of <br />split face concrete block and they are still working on a design that will be <br />satisfactory to both Wal-Maxt and Biskind Development Company. Ztao of the signs <br />would be a little over 10 feet long, with a 10 foot long sign face and the top of <br />the sign would be no more than 5 feet off the ground. The sign at the G'hester's <br />drive is proposed to be 8 feet above ground and 10 feet wide. It was clarified <br />that the letters would be internally lit. He did not think that this type sign <br />saas installed at either the Elyria or Brooklyn stores. Mr. Gomersall stated that <br />he he agreed with both the Planning Commission and Architectural Review Board's <br />recommendations that this signage was ridiculous, there was way too much. The <br />only sign needed on the front of the building was "Wal-Mart", not a11 the other <br />miscellaneous signs and a 7 foot high letters are too large, and should be <br />reduced to a minim„m of 5 foot high which is still over the code. He noted that <br />this board has denied numerous signs and logos on signs. He did not think that <br />signage allowed'on the east elevation. The Tire and Lube Express sign could be <br />permitted. The advertising on the ground signs is unnecessary, these three signs <br />should staCe "Wal-Mart". 7here is no problem with the 4 square foot directional <br />sign. Mr. Koberna agreed that much of the signage is redundant, since Wal-Mart is <br />a nationally lmown company. 7he Wal-Mart wall sign should be reduced to a 5 foot <br />high sign. He questioned if the ground signs should be as large as they are and <br />wondered if it was necessary to direct trucks on the Country Club Boulevard sign. <br />Mr. Gomersall stated that 90% of the trucks would belong to Wal-Mart and doubted <br />that the lack of a"truck entrance".sign at the other entrances would keep <br />outside trucks from entering at those locations. Mr. Orlowski stated that Federal <br />Express or U.P.S. would come to the front of the building regardless. Mr. <br />7 .