07/06/1994 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

to his detached garage was on that side, so Mr. Conway believed that there should be enough room, but the board could grant the variance requested and if the fireplace needed another variance, he could bring it back to the board. The members had no problem with the request. T. Kobema moved to grant the request of James and Christine Marrynowski, 5542 Porter Road, for a special permit to add second floor to existing non-conforming (front setback) 1-1/2 story dwelling, seconded by J. Maloney, and unanunously approved. Special permit granted. 10. Dennis W. Brown, 5978 Columbia Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 2.5 foot setback variance to construct front porch. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.06 (2). Chairmau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was adininistered to Mr. Dolce, contractor, who explained that the roof overhang was the main reason they needed the variance. Mr. Gomersall believed that it was probably more than just the overhaug, but there was no objection. to the request. R. Gomersall moved to grant the request of Dennis W. Brown, 5978 Columbia Road for a 2.5 foot front setback variance to construct a front porch. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.06(2), seconded by J. Maloney and unanimously approved. Variance granted. _ 11. George Sliflco, 24353 North Oxford Ova1 Request for variance (1123.12). Request 9 foot rear yard variance to construct enclosed patio. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.08 (a). Chairmau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mh and Mrs. Slifko and Mr. Wagner, contractor, who presented the plans. It was clarified that this would be 12 feet out, and there was 3 feet before they encroached in the 50 foot setback. The members had no problem with the request. J. Maloney moved to grant the request of George Slifko, 24353 North Oxford Oval, for a 9 foot rear yard variance to construct enclosed patio, seconded by R. Gomersall, and u.nanimously approved. Variance granted. 12. Ganley Honda, 27870 Lorain Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 34 square foot variance for maximum signage allowed on a business u.nit. Also request 18 square foot variance for maximum signage allowed for a wall sign. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1163.11 (c) and 1163.11 (b). Note: if window signs are kept for over 30 days, a variance and permit will be required. Also, the pole sign is not being addressed at this time. Chairmau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Kalina, sign contractor. Mr. Gomersall would have preferred that a representative from the company had been present, since the members had a problem with all the window signs. Mr. Kalina advised that they were given permits for these as temporary signs for a 30 day period. Now they have covered all the signs of the previous owner, and these will be removed. He explained that the wall sign that says "automobiles" would be changed to say "Ganley" and would be moved over to the sign that says "Honda" and they would use the same cabinets. Mr. Gomersall questioned why this sign had different types of letters, and the Pontiac has the same letters. Mr. Ka.lina stated that they did this because there was already a problem with the amount of signage and this would not increase the sign area. Mr. Conway clarified that when the application for this hearing was made, Mr. Kalina was not able to address the pole sign, but now he is requesting to 4