My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/19/1995 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1995
>
1995 Architectural Review Board
>
07/19/1995 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:05 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 8:40:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1995
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
7/19/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
v ? <br />are on a raceway in order to get iTL approval and if "the letters were applied directly to the building, <br />there would be holes wluch could cause leakage. He stated that the raceways will be painted to match <br />the building and there was no logo, per se, since the entire wording, including the star, is a registered <br />trademark. Mr. Yager stated, whether it is a trademark or not, it is a logo. He questioned if there was <br />any neon ou the building since it was mentioned by the planniug coinmission, but it is not shown on <br />the plans. There is ueou ov the letters of the sign, but it is covered with clear plastic, not exposed. <br />There is no neon band shown on these plans. Mr. Gallagher wondered if the sign adjacent to I-480 <br />would be seen fioin the freeway, aud questioned if they would come back for a fourth sign after the <br />other property is developed. The developers believed that it would be possible to see it from the <br />freeway siuce you can see Macaroni's when you are headed east. Mr. Yager has no problem with the <br />height of the letters, he does not like the rail system wluch obliterates the design intent of the building. <br />The board has regularly eliininated logos and the star is a logo. He iutends to suggest that they have <br />two sigus instead of three since, at that location, he could not ask them to have just one sign. He noted <br />that they actually have four sigus since they have a ground sign on Country Club. Mr. Zergott agreed <br />that there was too tnuch signage, but wondered if they did not need soinething from the parking lot <br />and for I-480. It was uoted tliat tliere were two sigus ou Cluli's and a ground sign, and two plus a <br />grouud sigu on Macaroni's. Mr. Yager suggested having two signs at whichever location they choose. <br />After viewiug tlie grouud sign, Mr. Yager questioned the necessity of having the neon "open" sign on <br />the monument sigu. Mr. Colson believed that this was valuable. Mr. Zergott read the minutes of the <br />plauning covunissiou wluch referred to the neon band on the building aud since he had not seen tlus on <br />the plans, he wanted to make sure that it would not be included. Mr. Colson stated that it was not on <br />the drawings that were presented, but he cannot address what might happen in the future. Mr. <br />Newberry stated that it is uot part of tlus package. Mi•. Zergott did not believe that "steakhouse" and <br />"saloon" was an advertiseinent for their product, since it was part of their name. He has no problem <br />with the sign or the star on it, but he does have a problem wit'h the amount of siguage. The members <br />agreed that there should be two wall sigus on the' building plus the monument sign. T. Gallagher <br />moved to reconuneud that the develop.ers of Lone Star Steakhouse and Saloon of Oluo reconsider <br />their planting structure to reflect tlus climate; that they relocated the dumpster as discussed,' but this <br />board prefers it further back and it should be placed perpendicular to oue of the driveways, preferably <br />the farther oue, but it should uot be along side of the building. The board recommeuds that there be <br />two signs on the building and ask that they consider restructuring the rails and removing the word <br />"open" from the inonument sigu. The motiou was seconded by B. Zergott, and unanimously approved. <br />W. Zergott will speak with their landscape architect: He further stated he thought that there were far <br />too many plautings around the buildiug. The developers will probably not have a landscape plan ready <br />for Mr. Zergott's review piior to plamiing cominission meeting, but they will present it at the meeting <br />aud then get lus approval before the B.Z.D. meeting. <br />4) McCormick Place Shoppirig Center, property located west of Plaza West Shopping Center, 23130- <br />23150 Lorain Road <br />Proposal to constiuct shoppiug ceuter. <br />Referred by planniug commission July 11, 1995. <br />1VII-. Crross, desiguer, Mr. Weiss, arclutect, Mr. Criltz, developer, Mr. Braemmer, Levin Fuiniture, Mr. <br />Haines, and N1r. Papaiidreas, represeuting the developers of the Sear's Hardware Store, presented the <br />proposal. Mr. Gross explaiued the revised site plan: the west drive has been eluninated; the building <br />has been slufted slightly to the west; rear parking spaces have been landbanked; the retention basin will <br />5 <br />G
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.