08/31/1995 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. Hobby's Etc., 23345 Loraiu Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to have two prolubited temporary, portable signs. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.12. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Costello, ovvuer, who clarified that he wanted one sign on Lorain Road and one on Clague Road, not Columbia, as stated in his application. He would like the signs which are not illuiniuated, from September 25th to the 31st for an anuual sale. Mr. Maloney stated that there was no September 31st. The members had no problem with the request. Building Commissioner Conway asked that he call the Building Departmeut so they could determine that these signs will not block visibility. J. Maloney moved to grant the request to Hobby's Etc. at 23345 Loraiu Road a variance to have two prohibited temporary signs, not lit, from September 25 to the 30th and with the stipulation that they give a location notice to the Building Department prior to placement. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.12. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 4. Edward & Kathy.Dillinger, 28265 Nandina Dr. , Request for variance(1123.12). Request 18 inch height variance and 23 foot location variance to install 4 foot lugh chain link feuce in required side yard setback. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(f-1). Chairmau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Dillinger who advised that the ageuda should read Edward Dillinger, not Howard. Mr. Gomersall questioned the drawing and was advised that the fence is on the property now and he just wants to move it so it will be closer to the sidewalk. T1ie members could not tell from the drawing how far away from the sidewallc it would be. Mr. Maloney advised that it should be at least 3 feet from the sidewallc. The drawing wluch was confusing had been submitted by the fence company along with the iucorrect name. Siuce the fence is chain link and is only 4 feet tall, the member agreed that there is no problem with it, but it must be 3 feet from the sidewallc. Building Commissioner clarified that the feuce would be 2 feet from the right of way aud there was a foot betweeu the right of way and the sidewalk so the variance would be 23 feet. R. Gomersall inoved to grant to Edward and Kathy Dillinger, 28265 Nandina Drive their request for au 18 iuch heigbt variailce and 23 foot location variance to install a 4 foot high chain link fence that will be 3 feet from the sidewallc in the required side yard setback. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(f-1). The motion was seconded by M. Boyle, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 5. Linda Michalewicz, 4606 Lansing Drive. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 13 inch total side yard setback variance for chimney. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section l 135.07(a). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Ms. Michalewicz. There was uo discussion on the request. J. Maloney moved to grant to Linda Michalewicz, 4606 Lansing Drive the request for a 13 inch total side yard setback variance for a clumuey. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.07(a). The motion was secouded by T. Kobema, and uuanimously approved. Variauce granted. 6. Ali Hamdan, 23521 Stoueybrook Drive. Request for vaiiance (] 123.12). Request 3 foot rear yard variauce for location of shed (already installed). Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(D)(4). 3