08/31/1995 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

., ../ , _ 9. Robert Jackson, 23884 Gessner Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 5 foot variance for total side yards and 5 foot variance to install a driveway in a side yard less than 15 feet wide in order to replace exdsting attached garage with addition and to construct a detached garage on property. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.07(a). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Jackson, and 1VIr. Hess. It was clarified that the present attached garage would be converted into living area and a detached garage with a drive to it would be constructed. The members had no problem with the request. T. Koberna moved to grant tlie request of Robert Jackson, 234 Gessner Road for a 5 foot variance for total side yards and a 5 foot variauce to install a driveway in a side yard less than 15 feet wide in order to replacQ eacistiug attached garage with an addition and to construct a detached garage on property. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.07(a). The motiou was seconded by J. Maloney, and unanunously approved. Variauces granted. 10. Luigi Veutiua, 5678 Decker Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 4 foot variance for distance between dwelling and proposed detached garage; request 5 foot side setback variance and 8 foot rear setback variance for location of garage. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(c)(2). Note: adjacent 20 foot wide lot is ovvued by , applicant, but has uever been combined with property on wluch house is located. Chairmau Goinersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Ventura, who advised that he knew that he would have to install a fire wall on the wall close to the house. Building Commissioner Conway advised that tlus would be right ou the property line and there would be no room for maintenance or overhangs, etc. and the wall adjacent to the liue would probably have to be a fire wall also. He further stated that the house was built over a property line so tecluucally the garage will be on a separate lot. This would be the time to clear up that situation. The members agreed that the garage has to be set back at least 2 feet from the property line for mauitenance. Mr. Ventura stated that he would be williug to install concrete between the garage and the property line to eliminate weeds, etc. Mr. Conway would like the Eugiueeriug Department to check tlus out because there migbt be a drainage problem, aud he would have to submit something to the Engineering Department showing that he would maintain all the water ou his own property. 1V1r. Ventura was not aware that there were two separate parcels and he was advised that the title company might be responsible since they did uot uotify lum of it. Law Du-ector Gareau advised that the legal description might encompass both lots and if he has one parcel number, the lots could have been combiued by the county. Mr. Veutura will check tlus out. Mr. Goinersall advised that if the lots were not combined, it would have to be done. Mr. Gomersall questioued if the variance for tlie distance between the house and garage should be larger since the garage is to be moved over, but W. Ventura did not tluvk so. ,Mr. Conway stated it was measured on an angle and inight vaiy a foot or so. J. Maloney moved to grant to Luigi Ventura, 5678 Decker Road, au agreed inodified request for a 4 foot variance for distance between dwelling and proposed detached garage; a 3 foot side setback variance and a 6 foot rear setback variance for location of garage. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1134.02(c)(2). The variances are granted on the condition that the garage will have fireproofed walls aud draivage as p"rescribed by the Engineering Department and that the applicant will work to have the lots comUuied iuto one parcel, if not already done.. The motion was seconded by R. Gomersall, and uuaiumously approved. Variance granted. 5