06/11/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. ./ to keep the architecture and aesthetics of the building in character with the existing homes along Dewey Road. As the members reviewed the plan, it was reiterated that they would like to keep the residential ? flavor of the neighborhood intact. Mr. Strelau stated that this is to be rezoned retail, but it is for an office use. The plan also includes buffering this parcel from the street as well as buffering along both Dewey and the northerly property line. Currently there is no buffering from the existing residential land and the general business district.. It was clarified that they will landscape and buffer the residents from this development. There will be low volume traffic, normal business hours, and low lighting. The plan is to keep the existing bu.ilding and tie in the parking. Mr. Strelau stated that they wish to keep the existing curb cut along Dewey aud are proposing an additional curb cut which will be peipendicular to the adjoining property lines. He explained that Councihnan L'unpert felt that the landscaping and buffering would beautify the area and enhance property values. Mr. Herbster stated that there is no guarantee on what will be there ten years down the road. He felt that rezoning this property will be effecting s'vc residential houses and including them in the traffic of a retail area. Mr. Strelau reiterated that Mr. Ondich has a good history in this city and hopes to pass this traditiou on to his son. In addition, he again noted that they have proposed the buffering, fences, and.landscaping to create a decorative barrier between this zoning and the residential zoning. Mr. Brennan stated that this hearing is for rezoning only, the building is secondary and he felt that rezoning this parcel would further intrude on the surrounding residential properties: In comparing this property with others on Lorain Road, Mr. Strelau stated that most retail properties have a 200 foot depth, whereas tlus property is 100 foot deep. He claimed that, although it may seem this proposal infiringes on the surrounding residents, it is consistent with other properties on Lorain Road., R. Tallon invited any interested resideuts to speak before the board. Mr. Hebebrand, a resident, asked if the residents could see the plans. Mr. Tallon iaivited the all the neighbors to view the plans and explained that this is only a concept and not • necessarily the proposal that will be brought forward. It was clarified that this proposal is for rezoning only and if the rezoning is approved, the building would be discussed at a later date_ Mr. Tallon explained that if this is rezoned as retail, Mr. Ondich can put anything in there that is compatible to retail zoning. Mr. Koeth added that this can only occur with the planuiug commission and architectural review board approval. The residents discussed this proposal with the commission. Mr. Hebebrand stated that in 1965 and 1969 the commission had meetings on the same thing and that if this property is rezoned the people on Dewey Drive would see nothing but businesses. He felt that tlus would effect the property values of the surrounding area. Mr. Tallon explained plauning commission does not rezone but rather recommends to city council, ancl city council makes the final decision. He further explained that this board will consiiler all the residents' concerns in making their decision, as will council. He encouraged the residents to express concems to their councilmen. A resident stated that this is a dead end street and he is concerned about the traffic. If people miss the office building they may turn down Dewey and turn around in the resident's d.riveways. The resident stated that this property is a natural barrier which protects them from the noise pollution on Lorain Rd. Mr. Hebebrand stated that there has been a big change in the area since he moved here in 1931, and feels that there is too much business in North Olmsted. G. Corale, representing his mother, is concerned about the curb cut and felt that this can be tied in to the existing curb cut. He thought that this should be rezoned as office designation only or remain residential. T. Howe, a 30 year resident, is concerned about the future, as there is no guarantee that this will always remain for office use. He also felt that there is ample office space available for rent. M. Smith, also a 30 year resident, stated that she felt this proposal will increase the traffic flow down Dewey Dr. She would like to maintain the character of the street, as many of the residents have lived there for several years. J. Finderbash, a 21 year resident, reiterated that the -? residents cannot be protected once this parcel is rezoned retail. She noted this street is in dire need of repairs and cannot handle any additional traffic; if tlus parcel is tied in with the sewers, it will make the e}dsting drainage problems worse. Mr. Strelau, in response to the residents concerns, stated that in 3