10/08/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. , `.,..:t there will be two doors to the patio. The awning will probably be vinyl. The existing site lighting will be maintained and refurbished. The patio will be illumiuated with building lights. The walk up window will be changed so that customers cau watch the bagels being made. He thinks the restaurant will probabl, be open until 10:00 p.m. The rendering showed a sign on the root and he advised the owners that thc entire area is considered a sign, and clarified that it would be a back lit awuiug material over a frame . with the white illuminated, and possibly some of the blue. He clarified that this was not an awniug, it was a sign. Mr. Herbster asked for a photo of this at night. Chairman Tallon clarified that this could not be a back lit awuing, it could only be a sign., Mr. Doty advised that this was a sign that would be complimentary to the avvuing below it. Regarding Mr. Conway's letter about the seating capacity, Mr. Doty advised that he would be sending a seating plan to him showing the proposed 60 seats. The outside cooler will be enclosed to match the brick on the building, which is to addressed as a minor change. Mr. Doty explained that the cooler will be on the north wall and the condenser will be on the roof of cooler and will not be visible. R. Tallon moved to refer Chesapeake Bagels, 24950 Lorain Road, proposal to renovate , former restaurant for bagel shop, including outdoor patio, to the board of zoning appeals that the variances for the patio be granted and for doing business in the 75 foot front setback be granted and refer to the architectural review board for their review of the materials an& signage. This proposal will then be approved if the variances are granted and with the recommendations of architectural review board. The motion was seconded by T. Brennan, and unauiinously approved. It was clarified during the framing of the motion that this will go to the November 7th board of zoning appeals and then on to the November architectural review board, but it would not have to return to the commission. 5) Hollywood Video 4692-4678 Great Northern Blvd. Proposal to renovate storefront which will include neon. Referral to board of zouing appeals is required for signage. This proposal was withdrawn by the developer for this meeting. 6) Burger King, 26270 Lorain Road Proposal to revise lighting on property. Original proposal denied on September 10, 1996. Ms. Miller, representing the sign contractor and Burger King, explained that they are replacing four existing poles and installing three new ones. The poles will be a total of 16 feet high, the same height as the building, with a forward throw light and 400 watt metal halide bulbs. The members studied the photometric plan, and it was noted that in some instances the foot candles were higher than the first plan; and there was 29.2 foot candles on the north west comer was and 10.1 foot candles belund the south east fixture. Ms. Miller explained that the crosses on the plan were lights that would not be installed. The members were confused because some poles were marked `?uew poles" and were crossed out. Ms. Miller clarified that they would be taking down the three existing poles and adding 3 new, 14 foot poles on a 2 foot base. Mr. Brennan stated that this is not parking lot lighting, they are directing it toward the building. He explained that lighting the parking lot can be serviced with a simple shoe box fixture directed down. He has a problem with the style of the fixhires, and believed that they are trying to make parking lot lighting into architectural lighting and there is nothing architecturally spectacular about a Buxger King. Mr. Herbster stated that every one of these lights are brighter now than it was before. Ms. Miller stated that this was to be their cooperate image across the country and they want tc upgrade the lighting for security reasons. Mr. Tallou stated that the commission addressed that at th( last meeting and security lighting is about .53 foot candles. Mr. Brennan noted that every pole with a double head on is 800 watts of lights. There is only one single pole in the back. Mr. Tallon suggested 6