My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/18/1996 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1996
>
1996 Architectural Review Board
>
12/18/1996 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:23 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 9:12:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1996
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/18/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
?? <br />M. Yager motioned to approve the proposal of Hollywood Video, with the following <br />recommendations: that the blue mountain scape be removed, the green panel extend; the entrance <br />portico be changed from a morning sun portico to a blue tone to coordinate with the metal panel. <br />Mr. Zergott added to the motion, that this board is referring the proposal back to pla?uiing <br />commission. Mr. Liggett suggested that the colors be coordinated such that they compliment the <br />Rini Rego's front. Mr. Zergott added, if the colors are coord.inated in -this manner, this may be the <br />best shot at getting the proposal tlirough planniug commission. The motion was seconded by T. <br />Liggett. Roll Call on Motion: Yager, Liggett, Krieger, yes. Zergott, no. Motion carried. In <br />response, to Mr. Klien's question, the clerk clarified that the next plauving commission meeting will <br />be January 14, 1997, and she will check with the chairman to verify the proposal will fit into that <br />agenda. The clerk agreed to coutact Mr. Klien when a definite date is established for the proposal. <br />2) Chesapeake Bagels, 24950 Lorain Road. <br />Ground aud wall signs. <br />Sign package and color samples of sigus and awning. <br />Heard at meeting of 11/20/96. <br />Mr. Doty, architect and Mr. Fitzpatrick, sign contractor, presented the proposal. Mr. Doty clarified, <br />he is here to present the colors of the awuing fabric and the landscaping. 1VIr. Zergott clarified he <br />will abstain from voting on the landscaping, as a friend of the family is working on the proposal. Mr. <br />Doty presented the landscape plan for the members review. He noted, at the last meeting the <br />landscape plan was denied, and several suggestions were made. Mr. Doty believed these suggestions <br />have been addressed and the plan has been updated as requested. The members did not appear to <br />have a problem with the landscape plan. Mr. Fitzpatrick began explaining the signs. The members <br />reviewed the drawings. Mr. Zergott explained the plants will be approximately the same height of <br />the wrought iron fence on the one side of the property. Along the east side, the landscaping will be <br />high enough to hide and help buffer the parking. The reason for most of the landscaping along <br />Lorain Rd., is to shield customers from the traffic. Mr. Yager asked for an explanation on the <br />signage. Mr. Fitzpatrick explained the proposal includes a ground sign, to be located on the south <br />side of the property as indicated on the landscape plan: Mr. Yager questioned, what the concept is <br />ofthe "Sweet Beans too" sign. Mr. Doty explained they are separate businesses. Assistant Bu.ilding <br />Commissioner Rymarczyk explained that they will need to provide the city with written proof these <br />are two separate businesses, and also verify how they will be run separately. Mr. Doty agreed to <br />take this information back to the owner. The owner can then respond to this request. Mr: Yager <br />believed the sign is nice, but had some questions concerning the logo. He would like an actual <br />photograph of an existing sign and logo, similar to the proposal. Mr. Yager believed the landscaping <br />has itnproved, but requested that the planting be extended all along Lorain Road. Mr. Fitzpatrick <br />explained the Chesapeake Bagel Bakery sign will be installed on the roof. Mr. Yager noted, the <br />board had a similar request with Einstein Bagels, and the members requested that the sign be lowered <br />down. He explained the relationship between the canopy and the sign is not shown on the drawing <br />and requested something in writing verifying a coordinated effort. He elaborated something could be <br />faxed to him or one of the other members that verifies this relationship. In response to Mr. Liggett's <br />question, Mr. Doty clarified tlie awning is actually a low sloping canopy. Mr. Doty noted, at the last <br />meeting, he took the boards comments back to the owner. The owner agreed to reduce the size of <br />the awning and incorporate outside seating, as long as it did not hold up the project. Mr. Yager did <br />not see a problem with shortening the canopy. Mr. Liggett cautioned a combination of shortening <br />the awning and the logo on the sign creates an image similar to a competitor, Einstein Bagels. He <br />noted this may not be something the owner wishes to pursue, but will leave this entirely up to them. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.