My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/18/1996 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1996
>
1996 Architectural Review Board
>
12/18/1996 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:23 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 9:12:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1996
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/18/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
?y <br />Mr. Barker, sigu painter, presented the proposal. The sign is yellow, with red letters and a school <br />house logo on the side. Chairman Zergott questioued the importance of the schoolhouse logo. Mr. <br />Barker believed it is important as the logo appears on advertisements. He noted the sigu faces the <br />parkiug lot on the back side of Hill's Department store and is mainly there to identify the entrance. <br />1V1r. Yager agreed the logo is inappropriate given conditions of the aesthetics. He elaborated, if the <br />building looked like the school house logo, it would be acceptable. Mr. Yager explained, by <br />removing the logo, the letters may be enlarged slightly as long as they meet the buildiug department's <br />guidelines. Mr. Zergott added, by increasing the size of the letters, the sign will becoine more <br />noticeable. Mr. Liggett noted, one of the directious the board has been taking is to eliminate a logo <br />if it is not incorporated with'vi the verbiage. He believed the board should consider some of the <br />graplucs, but understood the need to remove cartoonish logos. Mr. Yager responded, logos are <br />presented befare tlus board, and the members must then determine if it is acceptable. The members <br />were in general agreemeut that tlus particular logo is not acceptable. M. Yager motioned to approve the preseutation as submitted with the modification that the -logo is <br />removed. The motion was seconded by B. Zergott and unanimously approved. In the framing of the <br />motion, Mr. Yager noted he had no problem with the sign being eularged. <br />5) Studio Plus, will be located on Country Club Blvd., east of Victoria Plaza Apartments and west of <br />Grreat Northem Tecluiology Park. <br />Sigu package for proposed hotel. Building approved by plamiing coinmission October 22, 1996. <br />Variances will be required. <br />Mr. Jolmson presented the sign proposal for Studio Plus Hotel. The sign will be a cobalt blue color. <br />Mr. Johnson noted the printed copies came out too purple, which does not accurately represent the <br />actual color. There will be two building signs: one over the main entrance facing Country Club <br />Blvd., and another slightly smaller one ou the eastern elevation facing Tech Park. The lawn sign <br />includes an aluminu.m jacket, but the owner is willing to construct it in masonry, if the board prefers. <br />The ground sign with the verbiage "N. Olmsted Studio Plus An Extended Stay Hotel," will be <br />located on the east side of the building, within a landscaped bed. There will be entrance signs on <br />both Columbia and the rear of the Tech Center. Mr. Zergott asked to see the landscape plan for the <br />ground sign. Mr. Yager noted, it would look better proportionally, if the sign is reduced slightly in <br />size. He recommended a masonry base on the ground sign. <br />T. Liggett motioned to accept the sign package as presented with the following comments: that the <br />proportion of the signs to the gable ends be addressed by possibly reducing the size of the sign; and <br />the base of the ground mounted sign should be a masonry material similar to the building. The <br />motion was seconded by S. Krieger and unanimously approved. <br />6) Suburban Auto Body and Frame, 26618 Brookpark Road Ext. <br />Crround sign. <br />Variance may be required. <br />Mr. Hixon, sign contractor, presented the proposal. It was noted the request is for approval of the <br />logo. Mr. Hixon clarified the sign will be located on Brookpark Extension. The members agreed the <br />sigu package was acceptable. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.