05/08/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

location as the existing sign, at least 50 or 60 feet from the drive. Mr. Maloney was concerned about safety. After some discussion, it was decided that this sign would be located far enough away from the drives. Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk asked that the temporary chalk board signs be removed. Mr. Romp agreed. M. Boyle moved to grant the request of Dairy Queen, 24579 Lorain Road, for variances for pylon sign with changeable copy portion to replace existing pole sign and attachment to pole sign: 81.4 square foot variance for total sign area; 2 foot height variance; and 8 foot location variance from right of way setback with the agreement that the black board sign be removed. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1163.04(k); aud 1163.12(b). Note: No other temporary signs or banners are to be used. The motion was seconded by W. Purper, and unanimously approved. Variances granted. 5. Lori Sender, 3896 Walter Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to install a fence which will ruu 43 feet adjacent to the front setback ofproperty on the abutting street. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(f-1). Chairmau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was admiuistered to Ms. Sender and neighbor, Mr. Molls. It was clarified that the fence had been proposed to be 5 feet high, but when Mr. Gomersall was visiting the property, he and Ms. Sender had cliscussed amending the request to limit it to 4 feet high and so that it would only nui to the two trees on the property. Mr. Molls questioned why the agenda said 43 feet. Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk explained variance was for 43 feet, the fence could legally come up to the beginning of Mr. Molls 50 foot front setback, so only the remaining 43 feet needed a variance, not the entire 68 foot of fence. Mr. Maloney estimated that the fence would be moved back 7.5 feet. The plan is not to scale, so this might not be accurate. If the fence is moved back to the trees, it should be about a 40 foot variance. Neither Ms. Sender nor Mr. Molls objected to the modifications. It was clarified that the fence was to ruu adjacent to the two large trees so that they are within the fenced-in area. It was agreed that the variance should be subject to the Building Department's measurements. J. Maloney moved to grant the request of Lori Sender, 3896 Walter Rd. for a 4 foot high board on board fence which will run adjacent to the two large trees, with the trees being within the fence, to the front setback of the abutting property and the fence will run adjacent to the front setback of property on the abutting street to the basket weave fence in the rear. This is an agreed upon modified variance. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(f-1). The motion was seconded by R. Gomersall, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. For clarification, Mr. Gomersall signed a copy of the site plan indicating where the fence would be placed. 6. Paul Ebervl, 24035 Elm Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variances to replace shed: 126 square foot variance for area of shed which exceeds 2% of the rear yard area; a 40 square foot variance for area which exceeds the 200 square foot maximum area allowed; aud a 4 foot side yard variance for location of shed. Violation ofOrd. 90-125, Section 1135.02(d-1). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Eberyl, who explained that he was replacing an existing shed. It was determined that a fire wall would probably not be required. W. Purper moved to grant the request of Paul Eberyl, 24035 Elm Road, for variances to replace shed: 126 square foot variance for area of shed which exceeds 2% of the rear yard 3