06/06/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

members agreed that would be better. Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk advised that an 11 foot variance would be needed. R. Gomersall moved to grant to Kevin Kilbane, 4134 Brendan Lane, a ?mutually agreed upon request for an 11 foot variance to install swimming pole in required side yard on corner lot and a variance to have pool in side yard. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1135.02(I), and 1135.06(b). The motion was seconded by T. Kobema, and unauimously approved. Variances granted. 7. Pine Tree Beverage, 23239 Lorain Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to install a new sign and sign cabinet on existing non-conforming pole. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.19. Note: If sign were to be a ground sign variances would be required as follows: location variance to be in 35 foot triangular area; 3 foot location variance for setback from right of way; and 12 foot side yard variance for side yard setback. Also note: If approved, sign company is to certify that existing pole is capable of supporting new signage, includ.ing wind load against pole and sign. No temporary banners of anv tvue are to be displaved. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Phalgoo, sign contractor, who advised that he knew that the sign would have to be removed in 1998. Mr. Purper is concerned about the Building Department's concem that the pole will not support the sign and that the wind load should be considered. Mr. Phalgoo responded that they will certify that it will or if it would not, they would replace the pole. It was clarified that this has to be done before the building permit is issued. M. Boyle moved to grant the request of Pine Tree Beverage, 23239 Lorain Road, for a variance to install a new sign and sign cabinet on existing non-conforming pole. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.19. Note: If sign were to be a ground sign variances would be required as follows: location variance to be in 35 foot triangular area; 3 foot location variance for setback from right of way; and 12 foot side yard variance for side yard setback. Also note: If approved, sign company is to certify that existing pole is capable of supporting new signage, including wind load against pole and sign. No temporary banners of an,y tvue are to be displayed. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna, and unanimously approved. Variances granted. _.% 8. Russ Wallen, 6014 Burris Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 1 foot side yard variance and 5 foot rear yard variance to replace earisting one car detached garage with a two car garage. Also request 168 square foot variance for area of accessory structures which exceed 20% of tlie rear yard area. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1135.02(c)(2) and 1135.02(d)(2). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was admiuistered to Mr. Wallen, who explained that he wanted the garage in that location in order to save a large tree. The neighbor on the south was not present, but had stated that he had no problem with the request. W. Purper moved to grant the request of Russ Wallen, 6014 Burns Road, for a 1 foot side yard variance and a 5 foot rear yard variance to replace existing one car detached garage with a two car garage. Also to grant a 168 -square foot variance for area of accessory structures which exceed 20% of the rear yard area. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1135.02(c)(2) and 1135.02(d)(2). The motion was seconded by J. Maloney, and unanimously approved. Variances granted. 9. Phft Brzeski, 27190 Pompton Drive. . Request for variance (1123.12). Request 37.46 square foot variance for area of shed which will . exceed the maximum 2% of the rear yard area that permitted. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(d-1).