09/04/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

are adamantly opposed to two story garages. Mr. Ulewicz stated that he would like two floors because the first floor would be 10 feet high allowing adequate storage for his kayak, inflatable boat, canoe, motorcycle etc. The members did not have a problem with the 10 foot height, but would like the second floor eliminated. Mr. Ulewicz asked if he could have a 6 or 7 foot pitch, above the 10 f foot height, for storage. Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk clarified that 12 feet is the ? maximum height allowable by code. Mr. Purper asked Mr. Ulewiczif he is agreeable to a maximum ' 12 foot height with one floor. Mr. Ulewicz prefers 16 feet. Mr. Maloney asked if the members would be agreeable to 20 by 24 feet with a 12 foot height eliminating the second floor. Mr. Gomersall noted that 480 square feet is equivalent to a double car garage, but did not have a problem with Mr. Maloney's suggestion. Mr. Purper stated he will accept Mr. Maloney's ' suggestion, if the second floor is eliminated and the stairway removed. The members asked if Mr. Ulewicz is agreeable to 20 by 24 with a 12 foot maximum height. The members wondered if the garage ean be connected to the work area. Mr. Rymarczyk clarified connecting the two would be acceptable. Mr. Maloney stated that the work building is 18 by 24 and if the new garage is modified to 20 by 24 it would give an additional 3 feet for storage. The members do not want the two buildings connected. Mr. LJlewicz stated he would rather not connect the buildings. Mr. Purper clarified, by removing the staircase there will be a separation between the two buildings. Mr. [Tlewicz would like to come up 14 or 16 feet above ground level. The members concurred that 16 feet is unacceptable, but agreed to allow a 2 foot variance to allow the 14 foot height. Mr. Rymarczyk explained increasing the height would also increase the variance for the square footage by 72 feet. It was clarified this would exceed the maximum sguare footage allowable by 712 square feet, however the height variance will be reduced to 2 feet. Mr. Gomersall asked if Mr. iJlewicz is agreeable to the modifications. Mr. Ulewicz reiterated that this would allow a 20 by 24 storage building with a 14 foot height and agreed to those modifications. Mr. 'Ulewicz asked if removing the second floor would eliminate the requirement for a 3 foot footer. Mr. Rymarczyk acknowledged that the building department will require a 3 foot footer. Chairman Gomersall moved to graut the modified agreed upon variance for T. Ulewicz, 26775 Butternut Ridge Road, to install a second detached accessory building on property. The granted variances were modified as follows: A 255 square foot variance for area of shed which exceeds the maximum 2% of rear yard allowed; a 712 square foot variance which exceeds the maximum 200 square foot allowed for a shed; and 2 foot height variance. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02 (D1) and (D3). Note: The existing attached garage has been converted to a laundry room; there is no garage on property. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1161.08 (A1). The motiou was seconded by J. Maloney and unanimously approved. 'Agreed upon modified variances granted. 3. R F. DeFranco, 5409 Dorothy Drive. Request for variance (1123.12). Request a 6 foot rear setback variance to construct an enclosed patio. Violation of Ord. 90-,125, Section 1135.08 (a)'and (b-2). Note: Rear line is not parallel with street, thus the average depth method was used for this calculation. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was adininistered to Mr. DiFranco and Mr. Zielinski. The board had no problem with the proposal.' W. Purper moved to grant RF. DeFranco, 5409 Dorothy Drive, a 6 foot rear setback variauce to construct an enclosed patia Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.08 (a) and (b-2). The motion was seconded by J. Maloney and unauimously approved. Variance granted. 4. State Farin Insurance CoMauy, 23889 Lorain Road.