06/10/1997 Minutes (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

commercial and residential districts. All of the building is in the commercial district, but the dumpster enclosure and parking is in residentiaL He clarified that the last three rows of parking will be landbanked . as shown on the landscaped drawing. There were no further questions. R- Tallon motioned to refer to the a.rchitectural review board the proposal of Manor Care, 23225 Lorain Road, a proposal to construct one story building addition and enlarge parking lot. It was clarified the proposal does not need to return to planning commission unless significant changes are suggested at architectural review board and to accept the proposal based on the following agreements: that the parking lot lighting poles and/or wattage be reduced so that there is 0 tolerance at the lot line; light direction will be down and away from the property lines; proposal shall include the 46 landbanked spaces; and the drainage is to be refened to the engineering department so that the water is maintained the best way possible. Mr. Tallon believed there could be a mound on the property line with the fence on top running from the end of the parking in front of the building on the east side all the way to the back of the property line. He clarified the Engineering Department should address this drainage issue and determine if the mounding along the east property line is appropriate. The commission would like the mounding to be a requirement if it does not adversely effect the drainage. The motion was amended to reflect the granting of the conditional use permit. The motion was seconded by R Koeth and unanimously approved. Motion carried. The clerk advised architectural review board will discuss this proposal on June 18, 1997 at 5:30 P.M., and five additional sets of drawings are needed for this review. 3) Ganley 25600 Lorain Road (will come ifvariances are granted) Proposal to construct building addition with site improvements, landscaping and building renovations. Originally heard by planning commission May 27, 1997. To be heard by board of zoning appeals June 5, 1997. Proposal has not yet been reviewed by the architectural review board. Mr. Stoyanov, representing the constntction company, advised that the two variances were approved by the board of zoning appeals for building set back and for the displaying of vehicles. The current site plans include recommendations made by tlie planning commission at the previous meeting: the driveway approaches were reconfigured; some of the parking that was right up against the sidewalk was eliminated; and 84 parking spaces were landbanked. One hquse to the east will be removed. It was clarified that the old Glitz Bar was to the west. Mr. Tallon asked if cars were parked in the 75 foot front setback. Mr. Stoyanov responded that cars are parked right up to the sidewalk on both sides of the building, but they will be moving everything back. Mr. Tallon noted that twice before this business had been told not to park cars in the setback. He wondered why the cars were still there. Mr. Stoyanov was not aware of the cars parking in the front. Mr. Tallon highly recommended that those cars be moved back behind the setback in order for this proposal to go through the approval process. The members reviewed the plans for compliance with previous recommendations. The sign package will be presented later. R Tallon motioned to refer to the architectural review board Ganley, 25600 Lorain Road, a proposal to conshuct building addition with site improvements, landscaping and building renovations. It was clarified the proposal will be required to return to planuiug commission after architectural review board. The clerk advised architectural review board will meet June 18, 1997 at 5:30 P.M., and five additional drawings of the landscaping are needed. Mr. Stoyanov believed he provided enough, and the clerk stated she would check the files. . The motion was seconded by R Koeth and unanimously approved. N. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 5