11/25/1997 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.? 4.?. ? the back to do some landscaping as well as re-pave the concrete areas. He would like to see the landscaping placed as close to the residents as possible to keep the commercial traff'ic as far away as possible. Mr. Tallon would like to see the developer work with.the residents and did not envision a problem with The Illuininating Company. He noted the only drawback to the entire proposal is the rear of the building. Mr. Barrow did not intend to present half the proposal, but would like to continue through the process with the commission placing a stipulation that no permits should be issued prior to the buffering being addressed. Mr. Herbster wondered how the increased size of the shopping center would effect the parking. Mr. Conway confirmed parking would be an issue, however he could not provide any figures at this time because the architect will have to provide more detaiLs on the actual size of the building. He estimated the proposal to be 140 parking spaces short of the code requirements, but was unsure of this number as there is some shared parking that will have to be disclosed. In addition to the parking, Mr. Conway stated variances will also be needed for signage. He noted the figures could not be provided at this time because the size and location of the signs are not known. In reference to the signs, Mr. Banow explained often times the tenant receives a permit from the city that does not fit within the property owner's guidelines. The property owner is not able to do anythiug about it if approval is granted from the city. Mr. Conway advised the building department has not issued a permit for this property in teu years without a sign-off from the owner of the property. Mr. Tallon would like to see the sign package come back before plauning commission so that a recommendation can be made to board of zoning appeals. The awnings will be non-illuminated. Mr. Herbster requested material samples. Mr. Herschmau advised he did not bring any samples as he was unaware this board reviewed samples. He explained the material is a reinforced vinyl. Mr. Herbster addised, prior to approval, he would like to see the following: material samples, the current footprint of the building, and a footprint of what is being proposed. Mr. Tallon opened up discussion to the audience. Mr. Silski, a resident, wondered how much of the additiona140,000 square feet of addition. would be attributed to the north end of the center. Mr. Tallon advised all three expansions are on the north end. Mr. Silski wondered if the Handy Andy Store would increase in depth. Mr. Hersclunan confirmed the new addition would be deeper in this location. He did not believe this increase would be noticeable because it is spread out across so much area. Mr. Silski's concem was the service traffic. Mr. Herschman advised their would be enough area in the back to create a visual barrier. Mr. Silski wondered if the front of the building could be pushed out closer to the parking lot. Mr. Banow advised if the building is moved forward some parking would be eliminated. In response to Mr. Tallon's request, Mr. Barrow indicated the location of the two load.iug zones on the plan. Mr. Tallon would like to see this come back with more accurate plans showing the location of the loading zones. He suggested putting up a brick wall with landscaping to act as a sound barrier for the residential areas. Mr. Barrow agreed to explore this possibility. Ms. Doubler, secretary of the condominium association, had several concerns includ.ing: the city's notification procedure, the lack of cooperation from the developer, and the incomplete plans. She noted there are 260 homeowners that have to be notified and the association did not receive the notice until Thursday, November 20, 1997. When phase one went through the developer expressed interest in working with the association. Ms. Doubler advised, if the developer had worked with the association, the accuracy of the plans could improve. She requested that the commission postpone a decision until all these issues are addressed. In response to a question, Mr. Conway advised, for a"superstore", the ordinance ca1Ls for 60% of the lot to be within one half mile of a freeway. Ms. Doubler asked if the proposal meets this regulation. Mr. Conway confirmed the proposal does not conform to this regulation, as per .the engineering departments determination, however, this is an issue that should be addressed before board of zoning appeals. Ms. Doubler asked if the sparse shrubbery is on condominium property. W. Barrow was unsure at this time as the survey work is ongoing. Ms. Doubler wondered how the additional construction west of Comp USA would effect the driveway. Mr. Banow confirmed this driveway would remain. Mr. Tallon informed the developer to work with the residents on some of these issues. Mrs. Phillips, treasurer of the association, advised the association 3