Laserfiche WebLink
L ?. _. <br />would also like thein to look at the bricks, again, because the yellow he saw was different, and there <br />were two colors, one was more of a creain, but half of the building will be yellow and they will be going <br />froin the dark yellow to sometlung in-betweeu to soinetlung else iu back. The dumpster location will be <br />inoved back slightly to accoiuodate the addition. Mr. Yager stated that the city had a requirement for <br />screeving dumpsters. Mr. Gallagher stated that it had to be brick ou brick or board on board. The <br />developers re-stated that they had been tlu-ough protracted discussions with the manufacturers trying to <br />re-design these concepts. Building Conunissioner Couway suggested that tlus board could reject this, <br />aud plaiutiug comnission or council could over-ride theu- recouvnendation. Mr. Yager stated that he <br />said the same tlungs ui 1995 aud, even thougli they did uot have a coiporate image, that design was <br />exactly the same as tlus and he needed to see pictures to show it is a cotporate image. Every <br />corporation has it livuts aud its flexibility. He believed that coiporations are uow working with <br />coinmuvities. Nlr. Matkaovich explaiued that they had discussed adding some more columns and had <br />even eliminated soine of the windows in the ceuter, but Toyota wanted full glass. He clarified that there <br />was no planting iu fi-ont of all tlus glass. It was clarified that the landscape and lighting plans were <br />submitted with the Satuiu dealership. Mr. Conway stated tlus area is not a part of the submission <br />because it is existing, however tliey agreed to put ni soine pods along the fi•ont as the site plan reflects. <br />Mr. Yager stated that there is no sense making further suggestions until the Toyota people can address <br />prior concerns of the board. Mr. Gallagher advised that the signs would have to be addressed before <br />1998. <br />PLEASE NOTE: THE TWO FOLLOWING MOTIONS WERE WITHDRAWN AND THE THIRD <br />MOTION WAS COMl'LETED. <br />M. Yager moved to reject the proposal for coiporate Toyota and seud it back to planuing commission <br />so that they can review the conunents aud react to them. The motion was secouded by T. Gallagher. <br />Roll call on motion Yager, Gallagher, yes Mr. Liggett, no. (vote was not completed) Mr. Liggett <br />explained that he could not give a complete rejection, since tlus is better thau the mansard roo? but he <br />would like to see inore defiuition. Mr. Frye asked if he could get an approval for the additions, since it <br />might be months Uefore he could get Toyota to come in and discuss tlus issue. The members had no <br />probleins with theu- constiuctiug the two additious. Mr. Yager had soine couceru about the additions, <br />as the side elevatious have a series of pilaster unages and the brick looks like an added element on the <br />face. He asked what height they were matcluug. It was"explained that the brick would.go around and <br />would be lugh enough to cover the lower building. N1r. Yager noted that there were three buildings <br />which would be visible fiom Lorain Road. The oue building has a flat roof and one has a gable. They <br />will be following the height arouud. N1r. Yager wauted to kuow what they were doing, because it was <br />not shown clearly ou the plans. He further explaiued that the city wanted to screen the dumpster, <br />especially if it will be inoved out iuto the parking lot. This should be shown that on the plan when the <br />front elevation is resubmitted. THIS MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN. <br />T. Gallaglier moved to accept the Swuiyside Toyota, 26980 Lorain Road, only for the additions to the <br />existing building, with the coudition that the height of the building is to be match in the high point and <br />to coordinate the uew additiou to the cap or the other buildiug, in other words there is a problem there <br />with the two situation, the additions are to be brick and not block. When the front eleyation is <br />resubmitted, the board would like to see soyne corporate pictures and would like to have a corporate <br />representative present at the meeting. Also the dumpster location should be noted on the revised plan <br />and the a screeuiug inatei-ial, either biick or board on board, must be re-submitted. It is to be clarified <br />that this proposal must retuin to the board before anytlung is done with the front or the sign. Ihtring <br />the framing of the motion, there was much discussion regarding the front elevation and how to handle it, <br />5