11/12/1997 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

T. Koberna moved to grant the request of Ali Hamdan, 23521 Stoneybrook Drive, for a special permit as required by Ord. 90-125, Section 1165.02b(2). Also to grant a 20 foot rear yard variance to construct addition (existing screened in patio will be replaced) Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.08(a). The motion was seconded by J. Maloney, and unanimously approved. Variance and special permit granted. 9. Royal Nails 30700 Lorain Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request a 12 foot side line variance to install ground sign. Request variance to erect a tenaporary grand opening sign for a period of 30 days after meeting date. Violations of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1163.12(b) & 1163.12(g) NOTE: GROUND SIGN IS NON-CONFOliMING AND MUST BE REMOVED BY 1/1/98 UNLESS EXEMPTED FROM SECTION 1163.26. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was adiniuistered to Mr. Phong Tran, owner, and Mr. Woost, a neighbor. Mr. Gomersall asked if they were going to tear out the line of shrubs which will obscure the sign. Mr. Tran stated that he owned the shrubs and Mr. Woost thought that he was going to tear out the shrubs. The site plan was not clear and the parking lot was not shown correctly. Mr. Gomersall has no problem with the sign, but he would like the sign to be seen. It was clarified that the address was 30700 Lorain Road and the house behind was 30710 and this had been verified in the Building Department. W.. Purper moved to grant the request of Royal Nails, 30700 Lorain Road, for a 12 foot side line variance to install a ground signs and a variance to erect a temporary grand opening sign for a period of 30 days after the meeting date. Violations of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1163.12(b) & 1163.12(g), with the notation that this sign be exempted from Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.26 coricerning the amortizing of non-conforming signs. The motion was seconded by P. Miller, and unanimously approved. Variances granted. 10. No Excuses 27330 Lorain Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to have live music in existing bar without adding sound insulation. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1139.01(b)(3)(k). Note: No record of any noise complaints at this location to date. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Ms. Plu.mmer owner of the business. Mr. Gomersall asked if there was a reason why they could not add the sound insulation. Ms. Plummer stated that she clid not think that it would be needed. Mr. Gomersall stated that, although the adjacent tenants do not have the same hours now, later on the tenants might change and there could be a problem. Mrs. Plummer did not know that she could not have music until recently, and she has only had it one or two times, but she wanted permission to have it if she wanted it. The music usually starts about 10:00 p.m She would be willing to put in sound proofing if the music did bother another tenant. Mr. Maloney asked if she had permission from the owner ofthe center. Ms. Plummer thinks he realizes it, but is not sure. Mr. Maloney believed that the owner'should submit a letter to the Building Department stating that he has no objection to the music. Assistant Bu.ilding Commissioner Rymarczyk explained that the sound ba$ling would only be needed where the band would be playing. She explained that it would only be next to the unit where Enterprise Car rental is located, the other wall is the bar. Mr. Rymarczyk pointed.out that there have been no complaints to the Safety Department against this business. Mr. Miller suggested granting a variance for one year to see if there are any complaints. The members agreed. ..., . 4