Laserfiche WebLink
ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW March 19, 1986 Page 2 <br />a dark anodized brown. Board discussed roof, color rendering shows a <br />light brown roof which Mr. Pattison prefers. Mr. Ebin pointed out that <br />the metal at grade would cause a problem with corrosion; since building <br />is intended to be portable, this type foundation is necessary. Board <br />suggested galvanizing the metal or putting building on a 6" high founda- <br />tion.- No gutters or downspouts are shown on plan. The sign showz <br />on plan is a roof top sign which is nor permitted, signage must be sub- <br />mitted later. S. Ebin moved to approve the plans as submitted, exclud- <br />ing the roof sign; and conditional upon the Building Department's re- <br />commendation that they do something at the base which would not change <br />the character of the design, to avoid rusting and corrosion of the metal, <br />and approve the roof with the suggestion that the shingles be a blend <br />of light browns with a shake look to them, seconded by Mr. Pattison, <br />and unanimously approved. A conforming sign must be resubmitted to <br />the Board and both buildings on the property must be considered when <br />the Building Department reviews the signs. <br />2) Retail Building (W. R. Davison), 23900 Lorain Rd. <br />Proposal to construct retail building (second phase of Adon Equipment Co. <br />proposal, originally heard by the Architectural Board September 18, 1985) <br />Mr. Schmidt and Mr. Kasserman, the owners, explained that this building <br />will be the same material as the building now under construction. The <br />f-'aci,a will be a charcoal gray metal with a sign panel, buff split face <br />block will be on the walls (4" on front and 8" on rear walls), windows <br />will be clear glass. Mechanical equipment will not be on the roof, no <br />air conditioner is planned at this time, but a condenser can be installed <br />at grade on rear of property adjacent to existing fence. Mr. Ebin <br />would prefer to have all the electrical service underground. The owners <br />explained that because of C?,E.I's depth requirement, they would have to <br />put the wires under the retention pipe and the cost of that would be <br />prohibitive. All service will come into one pole on the property and <br />will serve all three buildings. 7' deep landscaping bed will be install- <br />ed across 75' of the front of the property. D. Pattison moved to <br />approve the plans as submitted, seconded by J. Britton. Roll call on <br />motion: Pattison, Britton, and Case, Yes. Mr. Ebin, No. Mr. Ebin <br />explained that the building is very nice, but he still does not like the <br />overhead wires. <br />3) The Doll House, 30036 Lorain Rd. <br />Proposal to use existing house for retail building. <br />(Heard by the Planning Commission February 25, 1986. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Urry presented plans for house which will be sided and <br />painted red with white trim. Forester has made recommendation to leave <br />one tree (which they had planned to remove) on property and take out <br />the other two. Board agrees with his recommendations. Bay windows wi11 <br />be installed in place of front, flat windows. Mr. Pattison suggested <br />that muntins be installed in windows and stated that he does not care <br />for the bright red color since this business is adjacent to a residence <br />(property is zoned General Retail); he suggested a toned down version of <br />the color. Mr. Urry advised that he had no definite plans for landscaping,