10/01/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OCTOBER 1, 1986 PAGE 2 ? Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Kasper. Board had no questions on proposal. R. Gomersall moved to grant Ronald Kasper'a 10' rear yard variance for a patio enclosure, seconded by B. Grace, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 4. United Dairy Farmers, Request for variance 24' set back variance that 50' set back was Commission meeting of a variance for canopy corner of Lorain and Columbia Roads. (1133.13). Request 6' set back variance for building and for canopy off Columbia Road per ruling of the Law Dept. required on both Lorain and Coltnnbia Roads. (Planning September 9, 1986) (Board of Zoning Appeals had granted as required with a 25' set back on September 3, 1986) Chairman Remmel called all interested parties bef.ore the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Mongello, architect, and his associate, and to Mr. Misner, representing Fairview Realty,owner of the adjacent medical building. Mr. Mongello advised that when proposal was before the Planning Commission the assistant Law Director ruled that a 50' set back would be required on Columbia Road as well as on Lorain. Canopies will remain in the same position, but building has been placed on the rear property line. Six foot variance based on.a 25' set back had been granted for the canopy in September.. Law Director Gareau explained that-althongh this had not been consistantly applied until recently,'the Law Department had ruled- that on a co mer- lot of • two highways, a 50' set back would.be req*red on both streets, since the ordinance reads a 25' set baek would be required on a sid'e street. fie also pointed out.that when S& 252 is reTocated, Columbia Road will no longer be a higliway.at this point. Since a 6' variance had been granted for the canopy the Board discussed what additional variance would be required (no variance had been granted for the building previously)`.. Mr. Mongello agreed to post- pone discussion until later in the meeting in order to figure exactly what variance they would need. Mr. Misner of Fairview West Medical Center ex- pressed several concems: what effect the four curb cuts planned wiTl have on the traffic;; that canopy and two pole signs (approved at the last meeting) would. d'etract for• tfie appearanee-of their building; and the fact that the building,is planned to.be-built right on the property line. He was advised that they are allowed' to build` on the proper•ty line and that the variance :,._.-. for the pole sign has been gratlted and cannot be recinded. The traffic issues'and curb cuts will be addressed by the Planning.Commission. Mr. MongelTo:wi11 figure tlie exact amount of the additional variance need and will present it to the Board later in the meeting. 5. Romp's Dairy Queen, 24579 Lorain Road. Request for variance (1133.13). Request 3' 8" front set back variance. Vio- lation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1174.02. Please note 20' front set back variance granted November 1, 1967. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Romp, T. Romp, his son, and the contractors. The Building Department had determined that a 3'8" setback would be necessary in addition to the 20' front set back variance that was granted in 1967. The appellants explairied that they needed a 4'1" variance at this time (measure- ment was incorrect because of mounded landscaping). Mr. Romp explained that originally they had only used 15' of the 20' variance th at had been granted and that that variance had been granted because they had promised to landscape