10/01/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OCTOBER 1, 1986 PAGE 3 the front set back. He also pointed out that they had eliminatedtfie double driveway on Lorain Road and they will be reducing their signage by 195 square feet. Board is concerned about the traffic problems at the drive through window with pedestrians walking across driveway. It was explained that a guard rail would be installed to keep pedestrians from walking directly in front of cars. This must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and the variance is addressing the front of the building onlyo Board agreed that atrium would be attractive and discussed Mr. Spino's memo concerning the existing building. Regarding the parking spaces, they believe that they will have ample parking, this too must be discussed at Planning Commission. Law Director Gareau questioned this since they are in court with this .pro- perty asking to rezone a lot in the rear on the basis that they need more parking. Mr. Romp advised that this parking would be-for an addition to the Drug Mart building. C. Remmel moved to grant the 4'1" variance as requested with the understanding that the Planning Commission will review this to their satisfaction and approval of this does not necessarily mean that this Board is approving any drive-through window concept, seconded by R. Gomersall, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 4., United Dairy Farmers, (resumed at this point) Mr. Mongello advised that they needed an additional 25' variance for the canopy. Mr. Gareau stated that perhaps the-previous var•iance should be ?vacated and the total 31' variance be vot.ed on. Board decided that previous variance should stand and.they would vote on the additional amount required. C. Remmel moved to grant an additional 25' variance for the northerly most canopy on the Columbia Road side and a 6' variance for the north east eorner of the building on the Columbia Road side, seconded by B. Grace. Roll call on motion: Remmel, Grace, Gomersall, and Helon, Yes. Mr. Bugala, No. Motion passed. Variance grantede At this point Chairman Remmel advised that case number 16 would be heard at this point at the appellants request. 16. Alan C. Wagner, 2841 Clague Rd. Request for variance (1133.13). Request variance for fence on corner lot (not 90% open)(pool and,.fence are installed, building permit 23867 was issued). Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04-H.. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mrs. Wagner who explained that they started to put up the fence and were told they could not have a 6° fence unless they put in a swimming pool, so they stopped work until they received the permit. They were not told the fence on the corner side had to be 90% open. Board questioned if they could ask the appellant to alter what was built under a building permit. Law Director Gareau stated that it is still a violation, but they should give some consideration to the fact that there was some confusion. B. Grace moved to approve the variance since in good faith they got the permit but with the condition that the gate must be 6' high, 90% open with a lock and must be completed, seconded by R. Bugala, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 6. George Lahl, 23045 Clifford. Request for variance (1133.13). Request 13` variance for distance between proposed 2 story deck and existing detached garage. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04-C. Request special permit to add to non-conforming dwelling (front set back). Special permission required Ord. 62-33, Section 1231.02.