06/11/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

h i~ n PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 11, 1986 PAGE 3 (sublots 2A and 3A) and are conforming in square footage, but will require a variance for depth. Proposal had received variances pre- viously, however, Mr. DiBenedetto did not have the plat recorded. Front portion of property facing Brookpark Extension is General Retail and rear is zoned "A" residential. Planning Commission had previously denied a rezoning of the parcel to General Retail. Mr. DiBenedetto would still like property rezoned, however, he is requesting this sub- division for residential lots. Mr. Coltman, representing Mrs. Koepke and another neighbor, Mr: Klimkowitz again stated they.have no pro- blems with the subdivision as long as it is for residential use. The developer stated he is going to try to sell the property residentially. T. Morgan moved to foYward to the Board of Zoning Appeals the proposal to resubdivide the DiBenedetto Sub division parcels 232-25-5, 6, and 54, approved in 1981, into three sublots and to forward all the information relative to the minutes of the various Boards, and so forth, to the Board of Zoning Appeals for their information; and that the Board of Zoning Appeals keep in mind that in reviewing this request for the variance that if commercial development is ultimately intended here, that this subdivision would make it very difficult to use commercially, that in fact, the parcel may have to be re-combined at some future date and it may-be worthwhile to determine what the developer's_intent is for these parcels prior to granting the variance, seconded by E. Traczyk, and unanimously approved. 2) Patrick T. Kilbane Sub division. Location is the east side of Columbia Road north of Gessner Road. Proposal is to re-align the interior property line of parcels 231-19-40 arcd . 2 31-19-41. City Engineer Schaller explained that this would be re-aligning an in- terior lot line to make two_50' wide lots (both non-conforming). The existing parcel 2 now has 30' frontage with a Yarge rear portion; parcel 1 now conforms to code. An adjacent neighbor, Mrs. Elliott, pointed out that the adjacent lots, in this area are all larger and that a house could'be build on parcel-..2 if it was placed back further on the lot. R. Bierman moved to refer this plan to the Board of Zoning Appeals with the recommendation that due to the fact that they are taking one con- forming lot and one non-conforming lot and creating two non-conforming lots we recommend that they disapprove it, seconded by J. Wixted. Roll call on motions Bierman, Wixted and Burns, yes. Morgan, Traczyk, and Brown, No. Motion failed to pass. T. Morgan moved to forward the proposed Kilbane subdivision to the Board of Zoning Appeals with no recommendations from Planning Commission, seconded by E. Traczyk. Roll call on motion: MorganB Traczyk., Bierman, and Brown, Yes. Wixted and Burns, Motion passed. 3) Pebblebrook Subdivision, Preliminary Plan (Revised) Location is west off Canterbury Road at the south corporate line. Proposal is to subdivide parcels 235-25-11 and 235-26-1 into fifty nine (59) sublots. Mr. Tony Janesek, Sunrise Land Company, and Mr. Andreano, engineer, presented revised plans and explained that they have purchased addi- tional land (9 additional lots); existing house will remain on sublot