05/27/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 27, 1986 PAGE 4 access be required around rear of buildings; would I-480 right of way be considered as the required 100' set back from the residential zone line; and would this property be considered a"through lot" which re- quires a 50' set back from both streets, since I-480 is in the rear. These issues mustbe addressed wfien the detailed development plans are brought back for consideration. Landscape plans are not definite at present, but buffer area adjacent to the residential property is heavily wooded now. No traffic signals are planned now for this area of Country Club Blvd, and Mr. Carlisle pointed out that the Corporate Center drives (across the street) could possibly be changed. B. Gorris moved to approve the preliminary land use plan for Great Northern Business Park located on the south side of Country Club Blvd. consist- ing of approximately 12.3 acres of what is known as Parcel B, and as a comment to this approval, we note that there may be certain problems as it relates to the set back of the buildings on the southern parcel line and as it relates to fire access and we would suggest that these problems be addressed liefore the detailed developments plans come back, seconded by R. Bierman, and unanimously approved. IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 1) Lancaster Subdivision Location is the north side of Summerland Avenue. Proposal is to sub- divide parcel 237-11-16 into two (2) sublots. Mr. Lancaster explained that he would like to divide one lot into 2 parcels, one being 65' by 254' and one being 45' by 254'; lot is located in the "C" residential district requiring 60' frontage.and would require a variance. Vacant lot to the east is not buildable because a sewer easement uses a portion of it, but Mr. Lancaster has made no definite plans; to purchase that 45' lot and assemble it witfi his lot, but believes this could be a possibility. Commission is reluctant to approve the lot split which would create a non-conforming lot. A variance would have to be granted and Mr. Gorris stated that he can see no hardship. After some discussion Mr. Lancaster decided to withdraw the proposal and attempt to purchase the adjacent lot or make some kind of agreement with the owner. Proposal withdrawn. 2) DiBenedetto Resubdivision Location is the north side of Brookpark Road Extension at Dover Center Rd. Proposal is to resubdivide the DiBenedetto Subdivision (parcels 232-25-5, 6, and 54), approved in 1981 into three (3) sublots. (Withdrawn from May 13th meeting by the Developer. Mr. DiBenedetto explained that the subdivision and variance for the depth of the lots were approved previously, but he never had it recorded and the variance has expired. He would still like to rezone property to General Retail, since he has been.unable to sell the property as residen- tial (front portion of property facing Brookpark Extension is General Retail and rear portion is Residential', property faces General Retail); however, request at this time is for the subdivision into residential lots. Rezoning was denied previously. Sublot lA (facing Dover Center Road) had been split off previously and was sold as a residential property; a 25'