06/25/1985 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r' - , ' _ . • .' PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 25, 1985 PAGE 2 Review did not recommend screening the dumpster. Councilman Tallon questioned the proximity of driveways to adjacent driveways. Western drive is 60' from fire station, property on east is a residence. He also questioned above ground retention. Underground retention is planned, this is overflow retention and is required by code according to Mr. Solte. Mrs. Brown believes that dumpster should be enclosed. T. Morgan moved to approve the proposal of a strip shopping center at 29328 Lorain Road with the recommendations of the Architectural Board of Review.and with the following comments: that a center driveway be the only driveway on to and from the property, and that the dumpster be enclosed or contained, that landscaping and screening plans be sent to the Architectural Board of Review, and plans be sent to the Engin- eering Department for their review of the temporary retention system, seconded by J. Brown. Roll call: Morgan, Brown, Traczyk, and Wixted, Aye. Mr, Burns abstained. Mr. Gundy advised that the building permit could not be issued.until the Architectural Board had reviewed the screening of the mechanicals.- This proposal_does not have-to return to the Planning Commission after Architectural Board's review of revised plan. 2) Biskind Development-Co., south side of Country Club Blvd. (between Victoria Plaza and 1-480). Submission of proposal for detailed development plans known as parcel "C" and including office building and hetel, as required in Section 1204.02, Heard by'Architectural Board of Review June 19, 1985. Mr. Carlisle presented plans and color elevation. Board of Zoning Appeals-had approved the variance -forthe 82' by 18' parking spaces, with the restriction that the additional land saved be retained in landscaping. No provision was made in the variance for reconsidera- tion at a later date. Safety Department_ report was _reacL.__-Fire De- partment had no problem provided that entrances and turns in the park- ing area can be negotiated by fire apparatus and that State and local codes be met. Police Department report stated: "The plans were re- viewed by Capt. Krynak N.O.P.D, he reports that this appears to be the same project he responded to on 3/27/85. These prints are deceiving on the locations of the drives, the west drive does not seem to line up with Exit 4(the signalized exit from the Mal]). His objection at that time was any attempt to cut through the median. They responded by letter that no cuts were to be made in the median. He questions who will install the mast arm and install the signals and pole facing south at Exit 4." Mr. Carlisle stated that the drive will line up with exit 4 and a drawing can be provided. Mr. Carlisle will arrange a meeting with the City to discuss the signalization. Plan showing adjacent pro- perties on Kennedy Ridge was studied. 2vlr. Frick, an adjacent neighbor, agina stated his reasons for wanting a fence. Mr. Carlisle stated that the 50' buffer is being provided as required, and the further requirement of a fence would be a hardship for the developer. Board discussed variance granted: no time limit was included and no provisions were made for--a re-review by the City-of the adequacy of the spaces. Councilman Wilamosky would like a time 1-imt--set.- Assistant i,aw Director