Laserfiche WebLink
.A? , . <br />BOAR.D OF ZONING APPEALS APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 2 <br />per platted lot). Crestmont agreed to make sign 4f1 (originally <br />approved as a pole sign), a ground sign. So one pole sign would <br />need a variance, however the Board wants the total sign area to <br />be within the Ordinance (468 sq. ft.). In order to utilize the <br />factory's standard sized signs the Board agreed that instead o£ <br />two 50 sq. f_t. pole signs, they would accept one 4` x 8' (32 sq. <br />ft.) pole sign and one 5' x 14' (70 sq. ft.) pole sign. R. Bugala <br />moved to grant a variance for Crestmont Toyota, Porch, Audi for <br />one additional pole sign and that the Toyota pole sign be 5'x14' <br />and that the Porche-Audi pole sign be 4' x 8' and that this will <br />be under the total signage allowed by code for the property invol- <br />ved, seconded by E. Graves, and unanimously approved. Variances <br />granted. <br />2. Jerry Silverman's Carpet Mill Outlet, 26103 Lorain Rd. <br />Request for variance (1133.13). Request 30 sq. ft. variance for <br />addition to existing pole sign (Color Tile) and 60 sq. ft. <br />variance for total sign area. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section <br />1225.02. Also, request 7 sq. ft. variance for wall sign located <br />at rear of building (2nd frontage). Violation of Ord. 62-33, <br />Section 1221.06 E. Previous variance denied January 6, 1982. <br />Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. <br />The oath was administered. Mr. Silverman stated that the ex- <br />isting rear wall.sign would be removed and that all other illegal <br />signs are now gone. He stated that east bound traffic could not <br />see the wall sign because the view is obstructed by the building <br />to the west. Mr. Bugala asked if a variance could be granted on <br />the condition that the variance could be revoked if any signs were <br />ever installed which did not conform to the codes. Law Director <br />Gareau advised that the variance could be so conditioned. Mr. <br />Silverma.n stated that if the variance is granted for the pole <br />sign no other signs would ever be necessary, and he would agree <br />to such a condition. Mr. Bugala stated that he would be more <br />favorable to a variance on the pole sign if the rear sign would <br />be made to conform to the Ordinance. Mr. Silverman stated that <br />this sign had been purchased from another company which had gone <br />out of business. Mr. Remmel suggested that the pole sign could <br />be made smaller by eliminating the word "open" and that the ap.- ' <br />pearance would be improved if the sign was-the same length as <br />the Color Tile sign. C. Remmel moved to approve the variance for <br />the Jerry Silverman Carpet Mill Outlet pole sign with the con- <br />dition that it be exactly the same length as the color tile sign <br />and to granG the 7 sq. ft. variance on the rear sign, and that <br />both variances are conditioned upon his compliance with all Sign <br />Ordinances and in any case of a violation the above variances <br />will-be revoked. It is to be noted that Mr. Silverman agreed to <br />the above condition, seconded by L. Horvath, and unanimously <br />approved.- Variance granted.