04/07/1982 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 3 3. Danny L. and Renee L. McBride, 4990 Columbia Rd. Request for variance (1133.13). Request 1' variance for fence. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04H. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered. It was pointed out that the condo- minium could have put up a 6' fence on the rear property line without a variance. The Board did not feel that the 6' fence would be necessary along-the side abutting the G.r_e:at Northern' vacant property which abutts Brookpark Rd. E. Graves moved to grant the variance subject to the restriction that from the rear of the garage to the rear lot line the fence is only to be 5' high as permitted by code, and the rest of the fence as des- cribed on the plot plan will be 6' high, seconded by E. Graves, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 7. Ben K. Wright, 6021 Barton Rd. (taken out of order as announced) Request for variance (1133.13).'-Request 9' variance to subdivide s/1 1 and 2(27570 and 27554 Butternut Ridge) of the Ben Wright Subdivision approved and recorded October 15, 1979 by the City of North Olmsted. Request is made to add 9' in width to sublot 1 from sublot 2. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1157.01A Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered. It was explained that the adjacent house is only 2' away from the property line, and a variance is needed to place the home which is to be moved on to the lot. The Board was in agreement that this will be an improvement to the neighborhood. L. Horvath moved to grant the,variance, seconded by E. Graves, and unanimously approved. - ? 5. Joseph E. Crimaldi (Ben Schraegle), 4358 Dogwood Trail Request for variance (1133.13). Request 20 sq. ft. variance, 2' height variance, and location.variance for tool shed. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04D Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered. Mr. Crimaldi explained that;he owned the land behind him but it was not assembled to his property. According to the Ordznance he cannot put the shed on a vacant lot. It was agreed that he could put it on the vacant lot and that it must be 5' from the adjacent neighbor's property. R. Bugala moved to approve a variance for the location of the shed on the vacant lot but the shed must be located 5' from any lot line of an adjoining neighbor. The size and height of the shed must conform to the Ordinance, seconded by L. Horvath, and unani- mously approved. .