Laserfiche WebLink
ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW MAY 17, 1982 PAGE 4 <br />G. Draeger, Architect, explained the plans. A new front <br />section will be added in wood: texture 111, stained natural, <br />brick will be painted. white. Manufacturer stated that paint <br />will last 8 to 10 years, Mr. Draeger estimates 6 years. <br />Guard rail will be installed between Arby's and the adjacent <br />Milton's restaurant. At the Planning Commission's request, <br />Mr. Draeger has prepared a combined drawing showing Milton's <br />and Arby's driveways and parking areas, however, it has not <br />yet been submitted because owners are still discussing issue. <br />Mr. Parry suggested that the two restaurants share one curb <br />cut (driveway could be striped) for an entrance only drive <br />and the exit for Milton's would be to the rear of Arby':s. <br />Mr. Draeger does not believe that such an easement would <br />work, especially if ownership changed. Doorway to east will <br />be 22' door for emergenc.y.exit only (opens onto driveway), <br />it was also pointed out that the ladies' restroom door opens <br />onto 2.' walk beside driveway. This could be changed. Mr. <br />Parry suggested that there be curbing or tire stops along <br />Silvardale Ave. parking to keep cars from overlapping side- <br />walk. S. Ebin moved to accept the Arby's proposal as sub- <br />mitted with the provision that the women's restroom door be <br />relocated to the north side of the building; that provisions <br />be made along Silverdale to eliminate automobiles encroaching <br />on the sidewalk; and that the owner carefully consider paint- <br />ing brick because of the potential constant maintenance pro- <br />blems in the future, seconded by M. Case. Roll call on <br />motion: Ebin and Case, aye. Parr, Nay. Note: Mr. Parry <br />stated that his no vote is because he believes that the <br />driveway on the east side of the building is totally unsafe <br />and he feels that arrangements.should be made for a common <br />drive between the two propertieso <br />(c) Referred from Planning Commission May 11, 1982 <br />Rad Air (J. Bird), 24260 Lorain Rd. <br />Exterior alteration <br />Mr. S. Kresgee, owner of the business, explained the alter- <br />ation which will consist of future stone on the front of the <br />building and a new black mansard which will wrap partially <br />around the side of the building. Future stone will be blended <br />browns and the mortar will be a medium brown color. The <br />existing building is brick front and cinder block on the rest. <br />Mr. Parry pointed out that there are some gaps where the brick <br />abutts the block and is concerned about facing the building <br />with such a heavy material. The mansard should be deeper. <br />He believes that other alternatives could be found for ren- <br />ovating the exterior: putting in a light mansard which would <br />contrast with existing brick; resurfacing the brick and <br />painting it, giving it a colonial appearance:, putting color- <br />ful awningson windows;.or even just adding landscaping. Ac- <br />cording to Mr. Kresgee,the mansard will be built around the <br />existing sign (cut out around) and the Board believes this <br />will create problems when Rad Air leaves. Existing lighting <br />will remain the same and Mr. Ebin is concerned about wires on <br />the roof which are dangerous. S. Ebin moved to reject the