Laserfiche WebLink
ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW <br />design and that the owner have <br />artist to study the design to <br />acceptable design, seconded by <br />approved. <br />MAY 17, 1982 PAGE 5 <br />an architect or a trained <br />create a more pleasing and <br />R. Parry, and unanimously <br />(d) Referred from Planning Commission May 11, 1982 <br />Speedy Muffler King, (L & L Construction), 4565 Great Northern <br />Exterior alteration <br />L. Pulka of L& L Construction demonstrated how the mansard <br />would be applied to the existing building. The verticle <br />panels are cobalt blue and the coping and bottom flashing <br />will be white which will frame the mansard in white. Letters <br />for sign will be attached through the metal and into the <br />block of the building. The Board suggested that the bottom <br />flashing be turned up (at 90 degrees) to reduce possibility <br />of water being driven behind the mansard. Mr. Pulka agreed <br />that this could be done. Mr. Parry believes that the white <br />frame on the mansard creates the effect of a sign across the <br />entire mansard. There will be painting done by another con- <br />tractor. Since some painting will be done on the trim in a <br />similar blue color, Mr. Parry believed that the white coping <br />and flasing could be painted also. Mr. Pulka stated that <br />the 20 year guarantee on the coping and flashing will not <br />be valid if they are painted. R. Parry moved to approve <br />the Speedy Muffler King new facia with the following recom- <br />mendations; that the bottom flashing have a 90 degree water <br />return and that the bottom and top flashing be painted to <br />match the blue color of the panel, seconded by S. Ebin, and <br />unaimously approved. <br />(e) Referred from Planning.Commission May 11, 1982 <br />Sparks Tune Up (W. Durica, Jr.), 27045 Lorain Rd. <br />Review of site plan <br />Mr. Durica explainedthe plans. The existing building will <br />be painted white with blue trim on the top 3` (lower line <br />will be level where building is higher). There will be no <br />overnight parking. Mr. Parry did not believe that cars <br />could get into the first two parking spaces. He believes <br />parking can be rearranged. The existing driveway is used <br />by this building by agreement with the owners of the strip <br />center. The Board.questioned why no 7' set back had been <br />required since the use of the building had been changed. <br />R. Parry moved to approve the site plan with the recommen- <br />dations that they maintain the required 7' parking set back <br />and permit two parallel parking spaces in the front and <br />remove the remainder (three parking spaces) elsewhere on <br />the lot, seconded by S. Ebin, and unanimously approved.