07/01/1981 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS JULY 1,1981 PAGE 3 7. Norman F. Diederich, 3593 Beaumont Dr. Request for variance (1133.13). Request variance for location of tool shed. Violation of Ord. 62-33; Section 1151.04 D. Chairman Ledvina called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered. It was explained that this was a rental dnplex and that one side had no garage. If the shed is constructed 10' from the rear property line it would be about 20' from the Delmer Apartments•and also the rear yard is low and wet. The Board thought a small shed next to the garage would be less conspiuous. Mr. Diederich ammended his application to request a variance for a 30 sq, ft. tool shed to be immediately adjacent to the side of the garage. C. Remmel moved to g,rant the variance for a 30 sq. ft. shed adjacent to the garage, seconded by L. Horvath, and unanimously approved. Request granted. 8. Stanley T. Mysliwiec, 7110 Josephine Dr. Request for variance (1133.13). Request 16 sq.ft. variance for tool shed (rear yard area is less than 4,000 sq. ft.). Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04 D. No representative was present. Mr. Remmel stated that this tooT shed is erected and it is 9' high as well. C. Remmel moved to grant the variance, seconded by L. Horvath. Roll call on Motion: Remmel, Wasniak, and Ledvina, nay, Horvath, yea. Variance denied. 9. .Tames SuZlivan, 4538 Michael Request for variance (1133.13). Request 25' rear yard variance for a glass pool enclosure addition. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1163.01 --- or alternate request for variance (1133.13). Request a detached glass enclosed pool. Not a permitted use under Ord. 62-33 Section 1151.04. Chairman Ledvina called all._interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered. J. Shannon, Attorney representing Mr. Sullivan,, explained that the Sullivans would pre.fer the addi- tion to the detached building. The structure would be 14' high with a 2' brick foundation and glass walls. Building Commissioner E. Gundy stated that in his opinion the request for the detached building is not a permissive use in a residence area according to the Ordinance Section 1151.04 Paragraph L and is requesting a ruling from the Board. After a discussion of the Ordinance, D. Ledvina moved to that a glass enclosed swimming pool detached from a residence is to be considered a separate structure covered under the accessory building section of the code, and would not be considered a permitted use and would require a variance; since there is no size lzmitations by Ordinance the Board reserves its descretion to determine proper size limitations. If the pool enclosure is attached, it uiould be considered an addition to the house, seconded by W. Wasniak, and unanimously approved. The first request for a 25' rear yard variance for the addition was then ,