02/18/1980 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW FEBRUARY 18, 1980 PAGE 3 should be deleted. The type of Junipers should be noted, and that some thought must be given to the compatibility of the type of plant with its orientation, i:e., Junipers do not do well in the shade. It was pointed out that this is an extremely cold temperatures and that they should use Zone 4 plants. Also, using all low growing junipers would be boring. In reference to the site plan it was noted that the fence around the dumpsters cuts off a triangular section of Taco°Uilla's property so that it could no be maintained without going on to the adjoining property. The site plan calls for no pedestrian sidewalk, and cars using the drive thru window will block parking spaces. Mr. McGinty pointed out that they needed all parking spaces in order to conform to code. Mr. Parry stated that the roof top mechanical installations were not shown on the plan, and that there should be some information as to how high they were to be. R. Parry moved to table action and make recommendations and ask fo"r resub mittal, the resubmittal should include information not presented, including information on the height and type, with a sketch, of the mechanical equipment showing how it is to extend above the parapet wall; type of lighting on the site, complete building plans, grading plans with the f6116wing recommendations: concerning the site plan, restudy parking and access a) to allow extra space (5' plus or minus) at edge of access drive off of S.parky Lane, b) move the four spaces south of the building over 5' allowing for a raised sidewalk, c) redesign the drive-thru aisleway to move it so the center line is approximately 10 to 15' from the property line, d) restudy the trash recepticle fence to eliminate the angles•: Planting plan to be resubmitted with restudy of the plants themselves as per above comments, seconded by M. Case, and unanimously app roved. D. Williams moved to approve the signs as presented with the suggestion that the entrance sign be moved in 3 feet from the sidewalk, with the deletion of the approval of the location of the menu board contingent on the resubmittal and subsequent approval of the site plan, seconded by R. Parry, and unanimously approved. R. Parry moved to approve the building location and the building as submitted with its change in material conditioned on the re- submittal of the mechanical roof top units so that if the Board determines that the mechanicals extend well beyond the parapet that the Board may ask that the parapet be raised, seconded by D. Williams, and unanimously approved. Thesling Office Building, 25700 Lorain Rd. D. Ruzsa, Architect, explained the revised plans. The number of parking spaces was not increased, so that existing trees could be saved, however the parking area was increased to 64 feet overall