05/19/1980 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW P4AY 19, 1980 PAGE 3 May 13, 1980 and Board of Zoning Appeal of April 2, 1980 were read. Mr. 18rady explained that the garage would be sided with 6 or 8" siding to match the trim on the church, it would have an overhead garage door. He pointed out the pro-, posed site. The adjacent neighbors, who are appealing the Zoning Board's decision, voiced their objections to a free standing structure at the location. R. Parry moved to approve the addition of residential type garage on the property but to recomtnend that it be moved approximately 40' to the west and that additional landscaping be put on the east side of the garage, seconded by M. Case, and unanimously approved. (f) Fotomat, 23100 Lorain Road. Mr. Pete Fogarty represented Fotomat. D. Idilliams questioned the location of the booth, he contended that the booth should be relocated west of the main drive off Lorain Road. It was explained that the buildings would be steel aluminum tecnum core and aluminum sheeting. Mr. Parry felt that the building would not conform to the existing building on the site. Mr. Fogarty agreed to construct the base of the building in brick to match the store. The signage which is on the roof is to be lighted by roof lights. Mr. Fogerty agreed to take the roof lights, and the "Kodak Film" signs off the building. D. Williams moved to approve the plans as presented with the following recommendations: 1) relocate the building itself further to the west, wes t of the westerly drive off Lorain Rd as indicated on the site plans, 2) eliminatp.the roof lights 3) the "Kodak Film" sign be taken off 4) base be used with the matching brick to the building, 5) the plantings used be a type of a plant which will endure very dry conditions such as a juniper of the green variety, 6) All services be underground, seconded by Petroski,and unanimously approved. (g) Sunmark Industries (Sunoco), 23370 Lorain Rd R. Parry stated that this modern type canopy is totally out of place with the existing brick colonial style station. It was suggested that to add something to the roof to corres.pond with the colonial roof or to change the angle on the canopy so.that it did not look like a mansard roof. Mro Krall of Krall Construction thought that this could be done. D. Williams moved that the canopy be approved with the following recommen- dations: 1) That the roof portion be angled to more closely match the existing angle on the building if the construction will permit it. 2) 'I`hat the roof be made a slate color to more closely match the roof on the building 3) That the poles match the trim on the building „ seconded by C. Petroskio Roll call on motion: Williams, Petroski, and Case, aye; R. Parry, nay. Motion passed.