11/12/1980 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

s ? BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS NOVEMBER 12, 1980 PAGE 2 . 4. Victor Rodas, 24929 Chase Dr. , Request for variance (1133.13). Request 20" sideyard variance , for fireplace. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1161.,01. ,- . . ., -: . ? Chairman Ledvina called all interested parties before the Board. -The oath was administered. L. Horvath moved to approve the vari- ance, seconded by W. Wasniak, and unanimously ap.proved. Request granted. 5. Michael Santosuosso, 24996 Chase Dr. Request for variance (1133.13). Request 20" sideyard variance for existing fireplace. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1161.01: Chairman Ledvina called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered. It was explained that the variance was required for an existing fireplace which had been constructed by a contractor. Mr. Santosuosso thought that the contractor had received a permit. It was pointed out that the firewood is stored too close to the adjacent neigtibor. Chairman Ledvina moved to grant the request on the condition that_no firewood will be stored on that side of the house after the end of the calendar year, seconded by C. Remmel, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 6. George Prok, 24826 Arlington La. Request for variance (1133.13). Request 20" total.side yard variance and variance for distance between dwelling$ for fire- _ place. Violation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1161.01. Chairman Ledvina called all interested parties before the-Board. The oath was administered. W. Wasniak moved to grant.the variance, seconded by L. Horvath, and unanimously approved. ? -7. Great Northern Auto Service (Tony Difiore), 26674 Lorain Rd. . ,'. .Request for ruling of Section 1212.03 of the Zoning Ordinance permitting a combined use of facilities. ? Chairman Ledvina called all interested parties before the Board. , The oath was administered. Building Commissioner Gundy was called from another meeting to explain the request for the ruling. This is a combined use since cars cannot back out of the proposed garage ° addition without'backing into the joint easement. There will also be a fence'on the property at the end of this easement. C. Remmel ? questioned if it was legal to put a fence across the easement. ' This question is not the issue before the Board and must be decided between the businesses involved in the easement. It was pointed out that the cars which now park outside can be parked in the garage. C. Remmel moved to grant the variance as requested, seconded by L. Horvath, and unanimously approved. Request granted. ? -f. .