09/09/1980 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

t - • •, .o„ ? ' . ?. `? . PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTIIMBER.9, 1980 . PAGE 3 with an overhead door on the front elevation and increase the size of the overhead door at the rear. J. Roberts moved to ` refer the Tuff Kote Rustproofing proposal to the Architectural Board of Review. Mr. Gorris questioned why this should be referred to the Architectural Board of Review. Roll Call on Motion: Roberts; Perla, Morgan, Brown, and Bugala, aye. Gorris, Nay. ' (h) Jamestown Apartments, Phase 7, (David Margolius), Columbia and Brookpark Roads. D. Margolius represented Jamestown Apartments. Building Commissioner E. Gundy explained that this is proposed.for the north east corner of Brookpark and Columbia Roads and meets all code requirements for the Multiple family zoning. The buildings will be the same as the existing apartments. The subdivision of land necessary.for this development will be heard later in the meeting. •• R. Perla moved to refer the Jamestown Apartment proposal to the Architectu-ral Board of Review, seconded by B. Gorris, and unanimously approved. IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: (1) Federated Department Stores Subdivision - North side of Brook- park Road Extension (Gold Circle, west side). Tao (2) sublots from existing Parcel 232-25-35. Subdivision required for vrooosed Bryant and Stratton Business School. ' A.pproved under BUILDING-DEPARTMENT REQUESTS;- ITEM (c) . (2)' Vienna Wobds Subdivision No..2,'Preiiminary Plan - Located' east*of Walter-.Road-and south of theWestmark Development Co. subdivision No:•.1, (south' off 'GESSner -Road) • Taenty six (20) _ residential=sublots proposed:fxom:parcels 231-27-21, 231-30-1, and part of.'parcei 23.1-27-3: . "- - . D. Kader of,Vipnna Homes: and.-Fre&Bower--of Shor-e-West-Constru-ction presented the, preliminary.plan,.,It was:explained that this _ is a C.residence district:•.Neighbors questioned a boundry dis- crepenc.y -with _permanent parcel l 231=30-14 which was part.of a previous.subdivision which 'abutts this one. Mr. McDermott. . explained that further research had verified that_this lot had originally been plated prior to the existing codes and since the - eastern most line had already been established no variances ' were required and that the lot did not have to conform to the square foot requirements of the code. Neighbors*felt that recent flooding problems-would indicate that the retnesion " . system for the existing development'is not adequate. Mr. McDermott stated that this-area wili.have to have its bwn re- tension system,.but it will-not improve-existing problems.