12/11/1979 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLL'?dNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 1979 PAGE 3 combine parcels 231-1-100 and 231-1-1, seconded by R. Perla, and unanimously approved. la Robinson Avenue Dedication Proposal - TJithdrawn by Developer. 2 Ordinance IQo, 79-153: "Ai Ordinance vacating that portion of Maple Ridge Rd, which is located on the [aest side of West 231 Street situated bet-ween Permanent Parcel Nos. 231-15-9 on the north and 231-14-10 on the south in the City of North Olmsted. This item was placed in committee on Nov. 27, 1979. B. Gorris moved to take Ord. 79-153 out of committee, seconded by J. Roberts, and unanimously approved. Assistant City Engineer D. McDermott explained that if this street is vacated one parcel would be landlocked, since the proposed Subdivision, PSaxine Circle, is not at this time active and has been rejected by Council. Law Director 14. Gareau advised that this vacation would not be legal if it landlocked property. J. Saringer, cotmcilwoman, was advised that if another praposal for a suodivision is introduced and it provided for access to the landlocked preperty then the residents canre-petition for vacation at that time. B. Jo?-ris: moved to reject Ordinance 79-153 based on the opinion of the Law Director as to the legality of landlocking this parcel of property; it seems that at this time the Planning Commission has no other choice but to reject this proposal, seconded by- J. Roberts, and unanimously approved. 3 Deerpath Subdivision No. 6. Revised Preliminary Plan; (orginal Preliminary P1an reviewed and rejected by Planning Commission November 13, 1979). Located north of I-480, west of Clague Road and east of eastern end of Elm Road. 'Itaenty (20) sublots proposed from existing Peiznenent Parcels Nos. 237-22-13, 14, 15, 16,29, 75, and 237-23-26. Note: This Revised Plan does not conform to the North Olms ted Platting Ordinance 64-95 and 73-25, Section 3(C) , I tem 13 a. 3a,Elm Road (East. end segment) Vacation Proposal. Proposed vacation is actually part of Item No. 3 above (Deerpath Subdivision No. 6) and should be considered concurrently with that subdivision proposal. Assis tant City Engineer D. I4cDermott introduced the plans and ex- plained that this proposal differs from the first in that an access road to Clague Road was added; hoxaever, the access road is only 50' wide and not the required 60', and that sublots 14 and 15 (the original dedicated Elm Rd. ) a-re still proposed over the sewer ease- ment as it was on the plans which were rejected on November 13, 1979. Mr. Roger Clingman requested that the letter by City Engineer R. Zurawski ob jecting to building over the sewer easement be read. Secretary J. Brown read the letter from the Planning Commission Minutes of November 13, 1979. Mr. Clingman felt that an opinion should be from the Law Department based on what rights were granted by the easement. M. Gareau advised that anytime a street is- vacated the City retains the easemento The 50' segment was purchased by