Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Zoning Appeals 4-6-77 - 2- <br />ed._ The Board considered this proposal too large for the land area and any <br />changes as to size and location at this time was vague. Mr. Remmel moved that <br />this case be continued to provide time for the applicant to revise the plans, <br />seconded by Mr. Huntington. Roll Call: all members voted yes. Case continued <br />to the next meetingo <br />5. Margaret H. Vegh, 3872 Walter Rd. Request for variance (1133.13). Request for <br />18 in. variance for fenceo Violation of Ord. 62-33 Section 1151,04. <br />Chairman Ledvina invited the applicant and all other interested persons to as- <br />semble before the Board. Al1 witnesses, before testifying, were sworn in. It <br />was determined that the violation of the proposal is approximately 90 lineal ft. <br />of fence in the Theresa Lane setback area'. The objective is to restrain 2 dogs. <br />After discussion Mr. Remmel moved to approve the request, seconded by Mr. Hamill. <br />Roll Ca11 on motion: Mre Hamill, yes, Mr. Remmel, yes, Mr. Huntington, no, Mr. <br />Ledvina, no. The variance was not approved. <br />6. Vienna Construction Co., 27881 Southern Ave. Request for variance. Request f.or <br />2 ft. side yard variance for chimney. Violation of Ord. 62-33 Section 1161.01. <br />Chairman Ledvina invited the applicant and all other interested persons to as- <br />semble before tYie $oard. All witnesses, before testifying, were sworn in. The <br />Board questioned the applicants and their answers revealed the lack of knowledge <br />concerning the encroachment and that it would be possible to install a fireplace <br />within the dwelling. Mr. Remmel made a motion to deny the request, seconded by <br />Mr. Huntingtono Roll Call on motion: Messrs. Remmel, Huntington and Ledvina, <br />yes; Mr. Hamill, no. Variance not approved? <br />7. Kenneth N. Carter, 24706 Fawn Drive. Request for variance (1133.13). Request <br />for 7 ft. rear yard,var°iance; request for variance for distance between house <br />and garage and request to add to non-conforming dwelling. Violations of Ord. <br />62-33 Sections 1163t0I, 1151,04 (C) and hearing for request for special per.tnis- <br />sion to add to non-canforming required by Ord. 62-33 Section 1133e124 <br />Chairman Ledvina invited the applicant and aIl other interested persons to as- <br />semUle before the Board. All witnesses, before testifying, were sworn in, The <br />applicant stated the proposed addition would enhance his property values and <br />the need for the extra liveable space. The Board considered the unusual con- <br />figuration and small land area of the lot and also the three variances r,equest- <br />ed: Mr.. Hamill made a motion to deny the request; seconded by Mr. Huntington, <br />Roll Call on motion: All members voted yes. Variance not approved. <br />8. Ross G. 14illoh, Jr., 27729 M.arquette Blvd. Request for variance (1133•13). Re- <br />quest for 18 in. variance for fence height. Violation of Ord. 62-33 Section <br />1161.04: <br />Chairman Ledvina invited the applicant and all other interested persons to as- <br />semble before the Board. All witnesses, before testifying, were sworn ino The <br />Board determined this is a corner lot and some 125 lineal ft. of the propased <br />fence required the variance. Applicant and l3oard considered several modifica- <br />tions of the request.. It was moved by Mr. Huntington to deny the variance, <br />seconded by Mr. Remmel. Roll Call on motion: Al1 members voted yes. Vari- <br />ance not approved. ' <br />9. Gibson Partners? 25675 Lorain Rd. Request for variance (1133.13). Request