10/14/1975 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission 10-1? -75 - .3- Further discussion ensued. Included in discussion were locations - of homes to be occupied first, access off Dunford, class, type and design of possible home to be built on Sub Lot #205 if it were not to be used as roadway, number of children in the sub- division (300) (under 9 years of age). Mr. Freeh moved to deny the request. Mro Freeh changed his motion. Mr. Freeh moved to place in committee and to refer to Engineering Department to varify signatures; for re- view of records of original process and to investigate whether or not item had eqer come before Council. Councilman Goggin again asked what benefit will be derived for North Olmsted. Ed Menger, 3944 WOOdview Dr. spoke of traffic, garbage trucks, school buses, etc, Mr. Tischler seconded the motiono Motion passed unanimouslye Planning Commission, at its next meeting Oct. 28, 1975, will con- sider the question again. (f) Deerpath Subdivision #6 -South side Elm Road at Brendan Lane- 13 Sublots. Mro Clingman, Councilman Saringer and neighbors. Variance for one lot was approved by Zoning Board 10-1-75.' Drainage is tentative in set of plans distributed. Feasibility study is needed. Plan will require retention. Chairman Prokasy explained retention. Engineer McDermott said the lots do conform -- he has not had a chance to do a thorough study. Four homes are planned on proposed cul de sac. Storm drainage is to be southward; there must be commitment from State of Ohio Highway Department on this plan. There is nothing definite on plans for old F;lm Rd, and New proposed Elm Rde Mr. Clingman said he had reviewed storm water drainage with Engineer Childs. There was discussion of drainageo Mr. Prokasy again asked about the traffic pattern - old Elm Rd. and proposed New Elm Rd. The responsibility for procuring the information from the State is up to the developer. David Schenk, h665 rlichael and others discussed notification for Board of Zoning Appeals meeting Oct. lo James E. Shaw, 4586 Michael asked about traffic; the ultimate opening of Elm Rd. Commissioner Tischler stated he likes the revision, as presented tonight, less than the original proposal. He stated the State of dhio 18 ft. overpass will go''over the new houses, therefore he moved to reject the plan. P4otion died for lack of a second. There was discussion of variation of plans for NIr. Cli.ngman. Also 71 discussion of cost of bossible extension of road. Reoycled Bond - One etep to eave our eavironment