11/11/1975 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

` Planning Comm?ssion _ 2 _ ` "To: The Planning Commission of the City of North Olmsted ,)ubject: Developer's request to use North Olmsted Sandy Ridge Sub- lot #205 as an egress-ingress to a site in Westlake, Ohio located generally north of Blossom Blvd., North 0lmsted, which site comprises approximately 80 acres. WI-EREAfi; Sublot #205 is not the sole means of egress-ingress to a site in ir??estlake, Ohio located generally north of Blossom Blvd., North Olmsted and that other means of egress-in- gress in Westlake, Ohio are available to the developer which can be used by said developer to construct approxi- mately 185 dwellings on said site, and WHERE-1S: Permitting egress-ingress via Sublot #205 to said site would: a. Unnecessarily increase the flow of traffic within the Forestwood-Laurell Tn:Toods development, b. Create unnecessary safety problems for the children of the Forestwood-L•aurell Woods development, C: Create an unnecessary niiisance for the residents of the Forestwood Laurell 1,.7oods development; d. Create unnecessary maintenance problems for the City of North Olmsted. THERLF'OR, the undersigned residents of the City of North Olmsted urge the denial af a request to use North 0lmsted Sandy Ridge Sublot #205 as an egress-ingress to a site in Triestlake, Ohio located generall.y north of Blossom Blvdo, North Olmsted, which site comprises approxi- mately 80 acres." 1Vr. Alichol presented the petition to Chaixman Prokasy. The petition con- tains over 300 signatures. Several residents then addressed P].anning Commission emphasizing those matters covered in the petition and asking some questions covered in the Planning Commission meeting of Oct. 14, 1975. Commissioner Tischler inquired concerning the frontage of those properties on either side of proposed access road. He said he believes all lots in the subdivision are 70 ft. wide. Mr. Tischler asked for comments. Mr. Nichol asked if the homes on either side of the proposed roadway would be- come non-conforming. Councilman Goggin said in 1969 there was only one entrance into the sub- division; this lot, Sublot #205, was to provide a secondary access, now there are two additional access roads at present. He asked how does the plan as proposed tonight benefit the city? A resident asked if the people on either side of the proposed road were apprised of possible road. A resident, Robert P4oyer, who lives across from the proposed roadway, Sublot #205, said he was not informed of pos- sible road.