|
2. Appellant: Nlrs. Gertrude Gecking, 27450 Butternut Riage Rd., N.Olmsted.
<br />Ref: Request to continue to operate a Ceramic School, with related sales
<br />? and services, at the above premises, whicli is not in accordance
<br />with the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 1151.01, in which retail busi-
<br />nesses in residential districts are not permitted.
<br />Mr. Klinite read a letter f rom Mro Ted DeWerth, 27418 Butternut Rid.ge
<br />Road, not present, in which he opposed the continuation of the school,
<br />because of inadequate parking facilities and the risks inherent in using
<br />high-temperature furnaces. A'Ir. Klinite then read a letter signed by
<br />approximately one dozen persons ivho did not oppose the sclzool (K. Koch,
<br />Mr. & Mrs. Yacso, Nir. & Mrs. Berkitt, Beveily Dier, Mr. & Mrs. Holly,
<br />Merlin Lehan, L.S. Thomas, Mrs. C.R. Robinson, F1ora Demeter, A4arion
<br />UVelsh) e
<br />Mr. Caster expressed his opposition, saying the
<br />down by the Planni.ng Commission for retail Uusij
<br />Mayor Christman liad said it vaas okay 'co operate
<br />law of Frcd Heisery 27516 Butternut Ridge, said
<br />Caster said Jo#n But].er, 27537 Butternut Ridge9
<br />opposil:ion to the schoole
<br />area had been turned
<br />zess. Mrs. Gecking said
<br />her schoolv The son-in-
<br />Mr, Heiser objected. Nro
<br />not present, also was in
<br />The discussion brought out that during the hours of instruction, Nrse
<br />Geckin; generally has at least five students at one time. Nre Mangani
<br />said he felt five persons represented a public assembly, compared to the
<br />indiviclual teac:ning practice nornally followed by music teachers, which
<br />is permiitted by -the Code. Mrm West expressed d.oubt this situation could
<br />? be called a comrnercial enterpriseo
<br />hiayor Christman appeared to say he did not give his approval to N?rs.
<br />Gecking to run a school, and that ne either misunderstoocl her original
<br />questions about it or she misunderstood lzis commentso
<br />Mrs. Henry Caster expressed her opposition, commen-ting that most of the
<br />affected property owners were opposed to the school, while support for
<br />Mrs. Geckinj came mostly froin her students who were not property owizers
<br />in the areaa Mrs. Gecking's son, Robert, commented that classes were
<br />increasing in size, ancl that opening of a store for that purpose could
<br />be in the not-too-distant futurem
<br />Nlr. Schmitt moved to grant a nine-montll continuance of the school, with
<br />no advertising permitted, parking to comply with the law, anC that no signs
<br />should be used on the premises. Mr. Byers seconded. Al1 members voted
<br />affirmatively, except Mr. Greene, tivho abstained.
<br />3. .Appellant: Golub Builaers, 21099 ShelUurne Road, Shaker IIeiglits, Ohio.
<br />Ref: Request to build a house on sublot 103 Lynhaven 'rive, North
<br />Olmsted, with a 40 foot setback, in violation of Section 1159.01 of
<br />the Zoming Ordinance, which requires 50 feet.
<br />Mro Philip Golub represented his company. Mr. Edward Kelley represented
<br />several property owners as we11 as himself, as the owner of the adjacent
<br />• property, NZr. Wa? lace Brown represented the Park Ridge Associatioil, Mr.
<br />Kelley question.ed the location of the proposed house and driveway, saying
<br />his backyard would be extreme?y close to the.driveway, anct that the nor-
<br />mal setback seemed to be more desirable. Additional discussion resulted
|