02/09/1965 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Pebruary 9, 1965 -2- PHILIP ENGOGLIA SUBDIVISION (Terrace Estates) Ugon a report from the City Engineer that he had approved tl:ese revised plans, includincr improvement plans and grading plans, showing the revisions as requested by the City Engineer, it was moved by Mr. F'ord, seconded by NIr. SpaIding, to accept the improve- ment plans and topographic map of Angela Drive and Louann Drive in the Phi1iF Lngoglia Subdivision (formerly referred to as Terrzce Estates Subdivision) as revised per specifications of the City Engineer. At this time a communicazion was read directed to the Service Director under c'ate of February 9, 1965, stating 1_hat no improvements would be made until such time as the ditch is.cieaned up and the undersize pipe is replaced. A vote was talcen and it was unanimously approved. It was moved by I?ir. Ford, seconded by Mr. Spalding, that the matter of the sizcl::of the sanitary 1ot connection be referred to the Law Director as to the matter of 5" County Specification and 6" City specification. YEAS Ford, Spalding, Esgar, FaUek,Musial, LaPonza, Prokasy NaRTH F'ARK LSTATES SUBDIVISIOTI N0. 1(Resubdivision of Sublots 8711 887 89, 90 inelusive Upon a report of the committee that they felt the street should be reduced from 60 feet to 53 feet, adding an additional 5 feet to the Easterly 1ot to meet with city requirem.ents, discussion ensued and it was moved by Mr. Laponza, seconded by P'!r. Ford, to recommend to Council to put in a 53 foot right of way aind to deed the additional 7 feet of the right of way as now shown to the City or the property ocaner to the West of the groposed street and to so accept this p1an. YEAS LaPonza, Ford, Lsgar,. Fabek, Spalding, 1,1ia.sial, Prokasy. GREAT NORTH?'.iN BOULEVAP.D PAVI"dG Upon presentation of plans by Mr. Kanareff, Mr. Biskind and Air. Shur, the report of the City Engineer was read stating that he felt that a paving thickness of more than 7 inches would be recauired and if a divided highway was used he recommended a median strip of lo feet and an effective lane width of 11 feet (22 feet gu.tter to gutter), and also stating that there were no sanitary sewer plans foz the area and it would be his recommen.dation to reject these plans as presented. Discussion ensued relative to this progosal between the - Commission, ?" City Engzneer, Mr. Kanareff, Mr. Biskind and Mr. Shur c?NIr. Biskind stated that he felt a divided roadiqay would upgrac3e the "area on both sides and would be beneficial not only to the area in question but to the City anci the developer as well. He stated that they would be in agreement on the 10 foot median strip and that under the ordinances involved that what could be -required o£ the deveZoper is 32a_feet and possibly the 811 thickness, He stated that they would be willing to go along with 2-20 foot paving sections by 8" of thiclc- ness and that if traff..ic conditions or other conditions should demand more that the city should pay any diff erence if the City feels it should be oaider. They also f_e1t that it was a legislative decision and should be made by the F1ar2.ning Commission and Councile Discussion ensued and it was recommended by the City Engineer that the Commission