Laserfiche WebLink
Meeting of February 9, 1965 <br />-3- <br /> should return this to the developer and let him have the changes <br />s <br />ni- <br />n <br />th <br />h <br /> a <br />ere was <br />o <br />at <br />made. It was pointed out by rir. Kanareff t <br /> tary sewer plan showm because it would be located approxd.mately <br /> 400 feet Northerly of this street and wi11 service any development <br /> <br />, <br />in this area. It was moved by Mr. Esgar, seconded by Nii . F'rolcasy, <br /> that tlle plans Ue referred back to the cleveloFers for the purposes <br /> oi putting in the corrections of increasing the median to 10 f eet, <br /> increasing the depth of pa.vement to 811, and other corrections as <br /> set forth by the City Lngineer and that the Planning Commission <br /> feels it tisould be de'sireable to malte the lane width 22 feet but <br /> would accept 20 feet unless Cov.ncil sees fit to either insist upon <br /> the added width or to pay f or the added width with City funds. <br /> F'rokasy, Ford, Fabek, Spalding, Yiusial, Lalonza. <br />YEAS Lsgar <br /> , <br />The planning commission wishes to point out that it is in agreement <br /> taith 'the Engineer that the''?wiidth should be 22 f eet, however, zhe <br /> Commission ?:s of the opinio`n that by virtue of 'Elze:7ordinwnce -ifhat <br /> the cl°veloper is required to put in the minirnum oi_ on1;1G feet per <br /> lane. The developer will get an opinioiz from Council at their next <br /> meeting and wi11 then return wi-th their plans. <br /> CA.I2L MILSTLIiN - GREAT NORTHEPN TOWEtzS <br /> Mr. Nlilstein presented p1ans f-or a pronosed 18 story high rise <br /> apartment buildina showing 283 suites and a total of 436 parking, <br /> 150 inside parking azd 276 ou-tside parking, locatedoon Brookpark <br /> Road eas t of ?ahere the IW1ay Co. i s now being cons tru.cted. Each <br /> a. a check list which was <br />t <br />e <br />member of the Commission was p?e?en <br /> ? <br />, <br />? <br />thoroughly discussed in detail, rI'his plan showed no efficiency <br /> units and no three-bedroom units. 'I`he Uui1ding wou1d be 145' high <br /> and there would be r.zushroom type 1ighting. The only variation <br /> requested was to reduce the required inside pa-rking irorn 212 cars <br /> to 150 cars and N1r. D1ilstein was aclvised by the Law Director that <br /> it would be necessary to go bef ore the 2oning Board of Appeals to <br /> request this variance. lliscussion. ensued and it was moved by TvIre <br /> Ford, seconded by Mi. Esgar, to accept this proposal as presented <br /> pending the approval of the Zoning Board of Apgeals for the variance <br /> in underground parking. YEAS I'ord, Esbar, Fabek, IJaPonza <br /> NOS Spaldin?, Niusial y Prolcasy <br />SANDY RIDGE SUBDIVISION <br /> <br />The final plat fol this subdivision G,r <br />showing 101 sublots, some in 80 f oot <br />zaning. L?iscussion ensued relative t <br />was moved by NIr. LaPonza, secon.ded by <br />to the City Engineer for his review. <br />Lsgar, Fabelc, Nlusial, Prokasy, <br />C OM?IUN I CAT I 0NS <br />t=?LC r'l 7 <br />/m 7 ? U v`r <br />as presented by Mr. Kanareff <br />zoning and some in 70 foot <br />o this proposed p1an and it <br />Mr. Spalding, to refer this <br />YEA.S LaPonza, Spalding., Ford, <br />A communication ?was read requesting that <br />Commission minutes be sent to the Board <br />to the Board of Building Code Apgeals. <br />a copy of the Planning <br />of Zoning ApPeals and a copy