12/07/1966 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Zoning Appeals, December 7, 1966 Page 3. Mr. Carlson was present, also Mr. Harrison representing the First Neon Sign Co. Mrs. Kemer, 5991 Dover Rd. appeared and objected to the pole sign which Carlson Furniture keeps on all night. Mr. Carlson said he wasn't aware of this pro- blem and promised to turn the sign off at 10 P.M. Nrs. Kemer withdrew her objection. Mr. Carlson said the area in which his business is located is dark and dim and needs extra lighting. The proposed sign would correct this condition. Mr. Harrison said the dealers represented by this sign would contribute to its maintenance and the panel lighting would upgrade the whole area. Mr. Scheef aggred that Carlson's had a problem because the building 4ras not parallel to Lorain Rd. Mrs. Eian thought the proposed sign was not in-good taste and much too large. Mr. Nelson made a motion to grant approval of a sign up to 160 square feet subject to approval of a new sketch by the Board to be presented at the next regular meeting on January 4th, 1967. Second by Mr. Scheeff. Vote was unanimous. 5. kppellant: Maris Venners, 23591 David Drive, North Olmstedo Request for variance (1133.13) to erect a detached garage which will be 17' 3" from dwelling on adjacent property. Request is in violation of #62-33, Section 1151.04 (C) which requires a detached garage to be 20' from dwelling on the same lot or any adjacent lot. Mr. Venners was present together with Mrs. Venners and Mr. James T. Kiehl, 23609 David Drive. Mr. Greene read a letter written by Mr. Kiehl stating he had no objection to the proposed garag•e being closer to his dwelling than allowed by Zoning Code. Mr. Scheeff made a motion to grant the variance. Second by Mrs. Eian. Carried. 6. Appellant: I:imberly Development, Inca, 6556 Louann Drive, North Olmsted. Request for variance (1133.13) to build homes on S/L 210 and 211 Nantucket Drive, North Olmsted, with 35' front yard setbacko Request is in violation of #62-33, Section 1159.01, which requires 50' front yard setback. Mr. Mongello of Kimberly Development was present. He stated that the variance request was in error and he would like a blanket variance to include S/L 193- 211. Mre Greene said the Board could not issue this type of variance. Then Mr. Mongello requested if he could include S/1 194 and 196 along with 210 and 211 actually requested. Mr. Greene looked at the subdivision plat and said the Board of Education would have to be notified before they could act on S/L 194 and 196. Mr. Mongello then presented his drawings and informed the Board that this development would upgrade the area; that they had purchased CEI light posts and the houses would be rotated on the lots for good effect. He said due to financing problems he would appreciate the Board granting the variance on S/L 210 and 211. Mr. Scheeff made a motion to grant the variance. Second by Mro Nelson, Vote was unanimous.