My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/24/1966 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1966
>
1966 Planning Commission
>
05/24/1966 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:41 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 9:24:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1966
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
5/24/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. ? , <br />r ? <br />T • f?t#V of W`Vr#4 (01mote.?'x, 04t0 <br />May 24, 1966 - page 2 <br />There was Ilso tbe qqestion, until the City gets into their <br />Master Plan, wklether thei:,e were already excessive acreage for <br />retail zoning ?n the City; so, based on their thought, they are <br />not in favor of extending the zoning any further than it is <br />passed this 500 foot poirit. ° <br />Mr. Spald?ng indicated that his thou <br />with the Chairman's at this point. It was <br />was in favor of the medical building being <br />would be an asset to the City, but was not <br />ing the property as presently constituted. <br />plan it would T}ot be located tlzere. <br />ghts were identical <br />his feeling that he <br />located there and it <br />in favor of not utiliz- <br />Under the present <br />He further stated that until such time as thp City bjS <br />its Master Plan, the Planning Commission consider jq5? thiS par- <br />ticular parcel which is preseDtly zoned for com?erc?:4'1 apd not <br />add any more commercial area. Tn other words, ihey would be <br />adding tWo enterprises rather one in this case by extending the <br />zonirig. Wbether or not in the future it would be is something <br />that is yet to come. <br />Subsequently there were opinio.ns expressed pro and con by the Members of the Commission and by the representatives of <br />the project, namely, Mr. Shupe and Mr. Koster, into the ramifi- <br />cations involved. <br />Whereupon, Cbairman Prokasy moved to rejeet the proposed <br />rezoning of parcels of Medical Realty Inc, ; seconded IDy Mr., 2pal, ' <br />ding. Motion put to a vote; yeas, Spalding; Musial, LaPonza, <br />Pr.okasy, Esgar and Fabek; nay, Ford. <br />Page 3 under Committee Reports, Subparagraph (b). Mr. Ford's <br />vote should be changed from a yea to a nay. <br />Page 3, Subparagraph (c) the spelling of "Driscall" shoul,d <br />be "D-r-i-s-c-o-1-14" <br />- Mre L4Ponza moVed that the mi,nutes be acoepted as corrected <br />and seconde(? by Mr. Spalding. Motion put to a vote; yeas, LaPonza, <br />F4tiek, Spalding 4nd Ford, <br />SPECTAL PRESENTATION BY THE NORTH OLMSTED CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT <br />given by Mr. Storch, Dr. VanAuken and Mr. Lesko concerning the Spruce <br />and Birch Schools.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.