04/03/1968 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?Page 2- Board of Zoning Appeals - April 31 1968 ? the sign in general. Mr. Forcel?ini noved to grant a v4riance of IO square fEet for acdition of the crests to existing sign; seconded by Mr. Roberts and passea_. 5. Appellantc Kenrieth Haas, 5072 Whitethorn. Request for varia.nce to erect an addition to front of existing non-conforming house. A 161 front variance and a 71 sideline variance are requPsted. Request is-in violation of Ordinance /t62-33, Section 1159.0I2 a minimuri Qf 501 setback is required and Section 1161.01, the sum of the two sides shall be not less than 201 -w*ith a minimum of 5' on one side. Present: Mr. and Mrs. Haas, Mr. Reinker, Mr, Crickon Mr. Haas explained that they have seven children and need additional space badly. It is not possible to add to the rear of the house since there is just a 47' rear yard (this is why house is non-conforming), Mr. Reinker pointEd out that the entire street has maintained the 50t setback and he questioned the appearance of the addition extending furthur frontward. Mr. Greene pointed out that the law states that non-conforming buildings shall not be added to or enlarged except when altorations, and enlargements are con.forming v-1th the ordinance. He questioned whether or not the Board has the power to grant a variance. An interpretation-f'rom the Law Director will be reciuested and the case cantinued to the next meetinge 6. Apnellant: Columbia Esta.tes, Snc. Request to erect a house at 26763 Driscoll Lane 31 too close to the sidelineo Reque:t is in violation of Ord3.nance #62-33, Section 1161.01, the sum of the two sides shall be not less than 151. Present:: Dave Wonsetler Mr. WonsetTer stated that because there are no side Iines perpendicular with the strcety it was very difficult to place a house on this lot. A 3' variance is 'r.aquestea. The adjoining homes are a good distance from the proposed dwell.ing. Mr. Roberts moved to grant a 31 eari4nee; seconcled by Mrs. Eian and passed, 7. Appellant: Mario Masciere, 4I82. Brendpn Lane. Recuest to encTose a patio at rear of home. Rea,uest is in violation of Ordinance #62-33, Sect3.on 1163.01 whir.h requires a 501 rear-ya.ra. Pxesent: Mr. Masciere, Kenron Co. representative N1r. Ma.sciere presented photographs of patio enclosures done by the Kenron Co. He ha.s talked to neighbors and they have no objection. It was pointed out that the St. Brendants parking Iot,is at the rear of his lot. Mrss Eian moved, to grant a v-riancQ of 71; seconcled by Mr. Greene a.nd passed. 8 e-nd 9. Appellant: Ford. Mator Co., 27932 Lorain Road. Request to use the existing building temporarily and to permit vehicles to be displayed near the siclewalks. R.eauest to erect four pole signs (two of which are over- sized) along property f.rontage. Requests are 'i'n violation of Ordinance #62-33, Section 1174.02 which prohibita displaying merchandise withi.n the 501 setback area and Section 1225.02 regarding signs. ,