Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS - 5I7/69 - Page ?_ <br />/ <br />Cooney both stated that thpy-fe3t no variance should- be granted until the drain is in <br />and work.completed. It wa.s poa.nted out_that the case hGs been continued for-the Iast <br />three monthS pending cvrapletion of variout3 tasks suggested by the residents of the area <br />and tha.t the variance reQUested is vexy small - just 3square feeto Mr. Gundy stated <br />that he doesn't know personally-:if the drain will work or not but that in the opinion <br />of the Civil Ehgineer, it wil7_ uark and tha.t Mr. 5terta has promised to install a wall <br />if the plan isn°t workable, Mr. Forcelli.ni moved to gr.ant a variance of 3 square feet <br />of the proposed sign.with the st3-pulation that pxoper drainage be installed. He feels <br />there ha.ve been .d.efinite- improvements maele. Mr. Lancashire seconded the motion. The <br />H-ot3.an--?paSsed..withpMr. Greene voting noo <br />4s Appellants Bruce Geddis, 24861 Antler Drive. Request to erect-detached garage <br />31 fram sideline. RequeSt is in viQlation of Ordinance #62-33, Section <br />I151.04 which requires that a detached garage be a minirn.um of 51 from <br />any propexty Iineo <br />Present: Mrs. Geddis <br />Mrs. Geddis explained that the driveway is a.7.ready in 31 from Iot line (the builder <br />installed it there) and that in order to drive straight back into garage and-not have <br />difficulty.clearing the house to get inta the second sida: of the garage, a varia.nce of <br />? t would be nscessaryo It wa.s pointed -out that numerous persons in the area had <br />encountered the same difficulty. Mr. Greene movecl to grant a 2? variance; seconded <br />bp Mr. Eorcellini and. passed. 5, Appellaxit: Laurence J. Carroll. Request to srect a house of SA252 Soutlz Porter <br />Road (between 5508 and 5522 South Porter Roael) with inadequate square <br />- ?:"?:risu?fi.?i??t.;•si?,e.?and front yards.. Request-.i?s in violation of <br />Ordinanee #62-33, Section 1153.02,-Section 1159.0I and Section 1161.01. <br />Mrs Carroll explainect that the Bo-cird-of Building CodE Appeals had given permission to <br />build on this 404 lot bro_vided _variances are granted by the Bcsard of Zoning Appea].s, <br />He wishes to bUild•the house for his daughter and her farnily. Neighbors on both sides <br />of the lot. stated that they- vbj ect-to htn' building•--in thi.s. -locatimn and fear that it <br />will make. the area--too congested... The house. is a split-level that i5 .actually._larger <br />than most_in the area but the variance is necessary because only the first f'I.oor area <br />is considered. The house would be._situated_.even2y between the two houses on either <br />side - back 409. There is a 301 setback on one side and"a 501 Setback on -the other <br />sideo A 5' sideline variance would be neeessarry. A colonial-type house could be built <br />without any var3aMCes but Mr. Carroll didiatt feel that this type of houve would fit in <br />with others in the area. Mr. Gundy piairited out that any new plan weauld ha.ve to go <br />back before tlie Board oj' Building Code Appeals fex' their approval. Mrm Lancashire <br />movPd to deny the variance on the basis that too many -?nuld be requireci; seconded by <br />Mrs. Fian and passed. <br />6. Appellant: Charles parker, 6037 Burns R.mad. - R.equest. for spe=cial permit to build <br />an addition onto.non-conforning house. Permit..requested as per <br />Ordinance #62-33, Section 1231,02 and I133a12. <br />Mra r",arker-expIained thAt their present house is too-sma11 for-their familY of 5 and <br />they taish to build an addition that would confosin with all cade requirements. Their <br />hou se is non-conforrtzing in tha.t -there iS 51 on -each side in5tead of 51 and 101 as per <br />the code. Mr. Greene moved to grant a special permit; seconded by Mr:sa Eiani and passed. <br />7. Appellant: John Baratko. Request to build an addition onto non-conforming building <br />located at 23$45 Larain Roado A special perinit is requested as per <br />Ordiriance #62-33, Section 1231.02 and Seetion 1133.12. <br />Present: Mr, Baratko9 Mr. Fedor (attorney), Mro Kaserman, Mrm McIntylce, representative <br />for Mro Hanzes9 a representative of the North Olmsted Masonic Temple.