08/02/2012 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

pertaining to actual attendance which showed they would have more then enough onsite parlcing at 238 parking spaces. Granting the variance will not inconvenience the parishioners or the coinmunity nor will it adversely iinpact the strrounding neighborhood. Ms. Wenger reviewed the housing project which was approved by the Planning and Design Commission contingent upon the church parking variance being granted. Total parlcing spaces after the redevelopment is 238 spaces. City code requires places of worship 1 parlcing space per 2.5 seats in the assembly rooin. In researching 1999 records it appears the Building official calculated required parking using the occupancy permit which showed a maximum of 984 bodies not seats. When the church addition was approved an area was designated landbanked and to date has remained undeveloped. Now that the landbanked area will be part of the senior housing parcel it can no longer be used as a landbanlced area for the church. There will only be 64 actual existing parlcing spaces lost. In researching appropriate parking standards for church use, she referenced a book by the American Plaru-iing Association, which provided a survey of standards for parking used in communities across the country. The standards for churches range from 1 space per 3 seats to 1 space per 10 seats, with the most common standard being 1 space per 4-5 seats and St. Richard is proposing 1 space per 4.13 persons of occupancy. She also researched surrounding cominunities and found all westshore communities to be less restrictive than North Olmsted. As the city has moved forward they have looked for ways to be smarter with compact development and loolc for ways to eliininate large area of unused pavement. In 2004 the 'city amended its parking code to reduce required parlcing for major commercial developments. As a result the mall, which also received a variance, toolc advantage of the reduction and has increased the amount of buildable area and green space tluoughout the site. The unique nature of St Richards and the accessibility of off site parlcing options suggest granting the variance would uphold the intent of the Zoning Code. Ms. Bellido said she has driven by St Richards many times and has never seen the parlcing lot fiill during services. However the neighboring office building and banlc lots were full therefore she does not believe the reduction in parlcing will adversely impact the church. Ms. Diver voiced concern that firture attendance could be affected by the loss of the parking spaces. Mr. Lopez said in viewing the site it is clear the parlcing lot is not fully utilized and reducing pavement to increase green space is an improvement. Mr. Raig said the city code is more restrictive than surroLnding communities. To reduce parlcing which isn't being utilized for green space is an improvement which will benefit the applicants and neighboring sites. The city has a need for senior housing which is contingent upon the church being granted their variance. He commended the church for being willing to provide the senior housing needed. Ms. Bellido moved, seconded by Mr. Lopez, to grant CMS12-18: St. Richard Church of 26855 Lorain Road a variance for 156 parlcing spaces, code requires 394 based on permitted occupancy, applicant shows 238, section 1161.05 which passed 5-0. CMS12-17: I3urger King; 26270 Lorain Road Proposal consists of exterior building renovations and site improvements. A special perinit is required to add to a non-conforming building, section 1165.02. The following variances are required: