Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. A variance for 1 additional wall sign; code permits 1 per building unit, applicant shows <br />4, Section 1163.28(a). Note: BZA granted a variance for 3 wall signs in 2009. <br />2. A 68.2 square foot variance for sign face area (sign #1); code permits 100 square feet, <br />applicant shows 168.2 square feet, Section 1163.28(c). Note: BZA granted a variance <br />for sign height in 2009. <br />3. An 818" height variance for wall sign (sign #3), code permits 4 feet, applicant shows <br />22'8", Section 1163.28(c). Note: BZA granted a variance for a 14 foot high sign in 2009. <br />4. A variance for a sign (sign #3) projecting over the top edge of the wall, code requires <br />sign to be at least 12 inches below top edge of wall, applicant show sign projecting over <br />rooftop, Section 1163.28(b). <br />The recommendations are based on the main entrance needing to be identified due to the <br />setback of the building and proximity to abutting businesses. The recommendation to <br />approve the height variance is restricted to Regal Cinema only, which passed 7-0. <br />Mr. Malone moved, seconded by Mr. Rerko to recommend BZA grant CMS13-21: Rail <br />Restaurant of 4952 Great Northern Mall the following variances: <br />1. A 1 foot variance for height of wall signs (sign #5 and #6); code allows 4 feet, applicant <br />shows 5 feet, Section 1163.28(c). <br />2. A variance for 2 canopy signs (signs A and B), code permits one per building entrance, <br />applicant shows 3, Section 1163.29(a). <br />3. A variance for canopy signs (signs A and B) within 2 feet of other signage, code requires <br />a minimum of 2 feet between canopy signage and all other signage, applicant shows less, <br />Section 1163.29(c). <br />The recommendation is based on the size, setback and proximity of other businesses on the <br />property which passed 7-0. <br />Mr. Malone moved, seconded by Mr. Bohlmann to approve CMS13-21: Westfield mall of <br />4952 Great Northern Mall their proposal which consists of building faqade and sign <br />modifications too previously approved development plans with the following conditions: <br />1. The recessed LED lighting system used between the EIFS panels, require plans be <br />submitted in detail to the city for review and administrative approval. <br />2. The overhead door shown on the south elevation is to be painted to match the surrounding <br />EIFS color. <br />Motion passed 7-0. <br />CMS13-23: Hampton Inn; PP# 236-18-011 (SW corner of Country Club & Columbia) <br />Representatives: David Mann, Erick Allen, Roman Paich <br />Ms. Wenger said the proposal is to construct a new 120 room hotel on the vacant site. A similar <br />proposal was approved in 2008 but never constructed; approvals have since expired. The parcel is <br />zoned Mixed Use and is subject to various deed restrictions to which the city is a party and impacts <br />the development. The property can only be developed for office or hotel, no retail is permitted and <br />the maximum height permitted is four stories. There is a required 50 foot landscape buffer along <br />any residential, frontage and no driveway access to Columbia Road. Neither the Commission nor <br />BZA has the power to amend or change the deed restrictions in place. The proposed development <br />plan meets all the deed restrictions and area zoning requirements. The hotel will be four stories tall