05/04/2015 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-i , existing chain-link fence and construct the garage at the property line. The existing garage is non-conforming and the proposed garage although non-confortning is less than the current garage. Letters from his neighbors were submitted stating they had no objections to the request being made. Once the new garage is constructed the shed would be removed and everything stored indoors. He is trying to enhance his property which will enhance the neighborhood. The location of the garage is to ensure the garage doors lines up with the existing driveway. Ms. Rudolph asked if the height of the garage truly needed a variance and Mr. Russell said depending on how the applicant measured the height it may not be required but without the exact measurements the peak can't be determined. Mr. Allain asked if the owner had a business in his home and Mr. Sturgeon said although he is a plumber he doesn't run a business out of his home. Placement of the garage along the rear property line is to ensure the least amount of variances is required. Mr. Russell said in calculating the height of the garage, a height variance is not required. Ms. Rudolph said the abutting property is an open field and a detention basin therefore she has no objections. Mr. Allain said although the lots are so small they really can't accommodate a garage without variances, he objects to the garage being constructed on the property line. There is no way for the owner to build or maintain the garage without trespassing onto abutting property, he doesn't object to the side yard as there is enough room to maintain the garage and lawn. Members said they were not comfortable granting a variance to have the garage on the rear property line. Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Ms. Bellido, to grant APP15-3039: Jeff Sturgeon of 3029 West 231St a 2.5 ft. side yard variance for a garage too close to the side property line; code requires 5 ft., applicant shows 2.5 ft.,1135.02(c)(2), which passed, (Rudolph, Bellido, Papotto - yes; Allain - no) 3-1. Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Mr. Allain, to grant APP15-3039: Jeff Sturgeon of 3029 West 231St a 10 ft. variance for locating a garage from a rear property line; code requires 10 ft., applicant shows 0 ft.,1135.02(c)(2), which failed, (Bellido, Allain, Papotto - no, Rudolph - yes) 1-3. Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Mr. Allain, to grant APP15-3039: Jeff Sturgeon of 3029 West 231St a 1 ft. variance for a garage located from a dwelling; code requires 15 ft., applicant shows 14 ft., 1135.02(c)(1), which passed 4-0. COMMERCIAL APPEALS AND REQUEST CMS15-2762 Ganlev Honda; 25870 Lorain Road: Proposal consists of a dealership renovation involving building demolition, building expansion and site improvements. The following variances are required: 1) A special permit is required to add to a non-conforming building (1165.02). 2) A 31 ft. 2 in. variance for front building setback; code requires 75 ft., applicant shows 43 ft. 10 in., 1139.07. 3) A 9 ft. 5 in. variance for front yard setback to parking and drives; code requires 20 ft., applicant shows 11 ft. 5 in., 1139.07. 4) A 65 ft. variance for displaying merchandise in front building setback; code requires 75 ft., applicant shows 10 ft., 1139.07.